Uncle Charlie's Updates_3

Emerie & Uncle Charlie

Emerie & Uncle Charlie

Member
Uncle Charlie's Updates_2

-carried over from previous thread

@Suzanne & Darcy
So yes, technically he has earned another reduction down to .5 units, but you had already taken a reduction before it was earned so I didn’t think you should take another one. This is why I suggested a switch to the Modified ProZinc Method. Charlie is doing so incredibly well on this dose right now of .75 units — with very consistent numbers— that I didn’t want to rock the boat and change anything. You can take the reduction down to .5 units at the next shot, however, and see how it goes. You will be off for the weekend! Maybe it will be best until you finish the training anyway. What do you think?
Click to expand...

Hmmm, I don't know. What would I be doing differently if he were on the Modified Method? Is it a significant change that might rock the boat? My tether to the computer will be cut officially on the 22nd.
 
Emerie & Uncle Charlie said:
Uncle Charlie's Updates_2

-carried over from previous thread

@Suzanne & Darcy


Hmmm, I don't know. What would I be doing differently if he were on the Modified Method? Is it a significant change that might rock the boat? My tether to the computer will be cut officially on the 22nd.
Click to expand...
The significant difference between the two would be that we can increase doses more quickly without having to wait a week (remember reductions are taken any time they are needed.) It does not mean that we must change does because that decision is made strictly by looking at the numbers. It just gives you an option to increase without having to wait a full week. Of course you have to get at least one mid-cycle test in per cycle (morning and evening) but you already test enough I believe to do that. I see you have skipped a few evening tests in the last few days, but even a +2 test would qualify.)

I don’t anticipate Charlie needing any increases in dose right now anyway. It’s more the reductions right now that we are dealing with, but that is pertinent to the decision making process because under the SLGS method he has earned a reduction down to .5 units. With MPM he has not earned a reduction down to .5.
 
Suzanne & Darcy said:
I don’t anticipate Charlie needing any increases in dose right now anyway. It’s more the reductions right now that we are dealing with, but that is pertinent to the decision making process because under the SLGS method he has earned a reduction down to .5 units. With MPM he has not earned a reduction down to .5.
Click to expand...

*thinking*

Maybe then I will do the reduction tonight (already gave him the 0.75 this morning) and see where it goes. Thanks, I've missed being here. Y'all are busy with all the new sugar babies. So many of us.

How are yours?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top