Looby & Smiffy
Active Member
@Marlena @MrWorfMen's Mom @Capoo @Louise1989 @JanetNJ @scoobydoox @Alexi @Woodsywife
As you know for the past couple of days there has been a new trend in Smiffy's numbers and it is making me think that maybe her pancreas is starting to produce a bit of insluin again - what I think you would call 'spluttering'?
The day before yesterday for the second day in a row her numbers went down after her AMPS, then up again as you would expect, but then down again after she had had a small snack so that her PMPS was low - low enough for me not to give her a shot:
AMPS: 16.8
+3 6.4
+4 8.1 wet food snack and a few biscuits betwen +5 and +7
+8 12.4
PMPS 9.5
I have recently bought some Thrive and Porta21 Sensible dry food that I am mixing with her Hills m/d and also she has a little wet snack in the afternoon at about +5/6 (she is gradually eating more of the wet food but not enough yet to constitute a main meal yet) but overall her carbs are a bit reduced.
I am thinking that these numbers would suggest that after she had her snack which contributed to her numbers going up, her pancreas kicked in a bit to lower the numbers again? What do you think? Usually once her numbers start to rise they continue to do so until her PMPS. I keep her spreadsheet up to date.
I only have to give Smiffy one unit in the morning to get her numbers down into the blues now and for the past couple of nights she has been below 10 preshot so I haven't had to give her any insulin.
I am guessing that her high AMPS reading is high because she has bounced? How long do you think she will continue to bounce for her AMPS?
Do you think it is worth me giving her a half unit in the evening if she is at the top of her blue number range ie 11.1 to try to get the AMPS down or should I just wait for her to stop bouncing?
Tonight her PMPS was 12.4 so I gave her one unit as she didn't eat much in the hope that it might bring down her AMPS ....
Thanks for your continued help and support on behalf of Smiffy
Now that Smiffy's numbers are coming down Smiffy and I will need your support all the more ....
As you know for the past couple of days there has been a new trend in Smiffy's numbers and it is making me think that maybe her pancreas is starting to produce a bit of insluin again - what I think you would call 'spluttering'?
The day before yesterday for the second day in a row her numbers went down after her AMPS, then up again as you would expect, but then down again after she had had a small snack so that her PMPS was low - low enough for me not to give her a shot:
AMPS: 16.8
+3 6.4
+4 8.1 wet food snack and a few biscuits betwen +5 and +7
+8 12.4
PMPS 9.5
I have recently bought some Thrive and Porta21 Sensible dry food that I am mixing with her Hills m/d and also she has a little wet snack in the afternoon at about +5/6 (she is gradually eating more of the wet food but not enough yet to constitute a main meal yet) but overall her carbs are a bit reduced.
I am thinking that these numbers would suggest that after she had her snack which contributed to her numbers going up, her pancreas kicked in a bit to lower the numbers again? What do you think? Usually once her numbers start to rise they continue to do so until her PMPS. I keep her spreadsheet up to date.
I only have to give Smiffy one unit in the morning to get her numbers down into the blues now and for the past couple of nights she has been below 10 preshot so I haven't had to give her any insulin.
I am guessing that her high AMPS reading is high because she has bounced? How long do you think she will continue to bounce for her AMPS?
Do you think it is worth me giving her a half unit in the evening if she is at the top of her blue number range ie 11.1 to try to get the AMPS down or should I just wait for her to stop bouncing?
Tonight her PMPS was 12.4 so I gave her one unit as she didn't eat much in the hope that it might bring down her AMPS ....
Thanks for your continued help and support on behalf of Smiffy

Now that Smiffy's numbers are coming down Smiffy and I will need your support all the more ....
Last edited: