achrisvet said:
I'm a veterinarian about to jump on the recommending home testing bandwagon and have some basic technique questions.
Do most people hand hold the stylets or use the automatic device?
Vet sent me home initially with a box of 25ga Monoject needles to free-hand poke. They poked the
vein at the clinic, I guess because you can always get blood from the vein and you don't have time to
mess around getting the capillaries to bleed. It's reliable to get blood in a clinic setting.
But I found hand-holding the needles sometimes I would not poke deep enough and sometimes too deep,
also they seemed to hurt Smokey.
So I switched to the AccuCheck Soft Clix lancet device that came with my AccuCheck Advantage meter.
It took a while to learn how to aim and position it to the correct area. You must have really good light !
I found that with that one I had to dial to the deepest setting and even then sometimes I would not get
blood. Smokey had one tough ear ! Perhaps the SoftClix lancets are too small gauge...they are only
available in one gauge as far as I know, and they don't state on the package. The lancets are not
'standard' and you must buy their brand. I found the branded ones worked better than the generic ones I
bought from Hocks.com (they fit, but seemed to be inconsistent in length).
I preferred the way the Soft Clix works, because you can re-cock it one-handed, which was often necessary
with Smokey (continue holding the ear with one hand and re-cock/re-poke with the other hand).
So I switched to the Reli-On lancet device, with 'fine' (not ultra-fine') lancets. It was then that I started
getting blood pretty much every time. But I did not like the way it works as well. You must use both hands to re-set
the device, but holding it in one hand and using the other hand to pull a plunger that is at the back end. Fortunately, Smokey
would just sit on my lap waiting for me to re-cock the thing, if I needed to make a second attempt.
With Smokey, I still had to set it on the deepest setting. Every cat is different.
Recommend people start on a middle setting and work from there.
You just have to figure out what works best for your cat.
achrisvet said:
What gauge stylet is best?
Not the smallest gauge, usually. Especially for starting out.
achrisvet said:
Is it necessary to actually hit that little ear vein or is the goal capillary bleeding?
Not desirable to hit the vein. Meters are designed to read capillary blood.
achrisvet said:
I've read that you can use paw pads as well. I've used the accessory carpal pad in a big dog with success. Which pad do you like in the cat? Do you find cats tolerate ear pricks better? ( I know ECID).
While some here do paw-poke, this is not desirable because of the danger of infection from the litter box.
achrisvet said:
Do you know of any particularly good online videos to which I can refer clients??
Answered by others
achrisvet said:
Which meters do you use? Why do you prefer the meter you are using? Price of meter and strips? Ease of use?
I used the AccuCheck Advantage, the same meter my vet used in 2009. May be discontinued by now.
I know AccuCheck still makes meters, like the Aviva.
Meter I got at the pharmacy for around $70. Pricey but I wanted to be consistent with my vet. Strips
I bought on-line from Hocks.com 3 boxes of 50 at a time. I think they ran around $80-$90 for 150 strips.
Not the cheapest.
I liked that you could put the strip in, but not all the way. If you just set the strip in, prop the meter
upright. The poke, and when I got blood, quickly reach over and push the strip all the way in....meter
turns on. Then pick up the meter and sip the blood. This is good because if you turn the meter on too
soon, it can 'time out' before you get the blood. This a often a frustration for newbies, wasting a lot
of strips because the meter times out.
I did not like that the meter had to be coded with each new package of strips. A little 'key' (micro-chip)
had to be inserted into a slot on the meter with each new box of strips. Don't forget to do that or
your strips won't match the code and results could be inaccurate.
achrisvet said:
Thank you for your input.
You're welcome.