7/31 Jenks AMPS 100 +6 369 PMPS 296 +8 207

Status
Not open for further replies.

AZJenks

Member Since 2014
EDIT - Rolling yesterday's post in with today's so there's not two threads on the same day. Here's a recap of 7/30

256 AMPS
284 +9.5
252 PMPS
92 +7
72 +8.5
66 +9
60 +9.5
59 +10 (steered)
61 +10.25
70 +10.5


7/29

Starting out the day in the yellows. My guess is that Jenks may be a little bouncy after yesterdays beautiful blue day.
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks AMPS 256 +9.5 284

Thanks Julie. Looks like we'll need those wishes. He's probably going to be flat and yellow all night at this rate.
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks AMPS 256 +9.5 284 PMPS 252 +7 92

Well, I'd say we broke the bounce! :mrgreen:
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks PMPS 252 +7 92 +8.5 72 +9 66

+9 and still sinking. If he hasn't shown evidence of turning around by +9.5, I'm going to steer with some HC.
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks PMPS 252 +7 92 +8.5 72 +9 66 +10 59

59 at +10. Essentially the same number, so hopefully the HC halted the drop.
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks PMPS252 92+7 72+8.5 66+9 60+9.5 59+10 61+10.2

Still hanging out around 60 at +10.25
 
Re: 7/30 Jenks PMPS252 72+8.5 66+9 60+9.5 59+10 61+10.25 70+

perfect! the longer he hangs out in normal numbers, the sooner his body will accept them as normal! woot!
 
Re: 7/31 Jenks AMPS 100 +6 369

Jenks spent some quality time in the greens again last night. Because he does it so late in the cycle, it also means I'm spending some quality time without sleep.

It was probably unnecessary, but I stepped in to steer at 59, and I'm honestly not sure if that was the right thing to do. According to everything I have read, 59 is a perfectly fine number. But between the very late hour, and numbers still going down, it felt like intervention was the prudent thing to do.

Green numbers are still unfamiliar to me. Should I have let his cycle take its course and either begin to rise naturally or go into the low 50s/upper 40s before stepping in? Where do you draw that line between monitoring and finally deciding to give it a nudge in the right direction?

None of this may be a worry tonight with this ugly, ugly midday bounce.
 
Re: 7/31 Jenks AMPS 100 +6 369 steering question

well . . . yes, over 50 is perfectly safe. the answer to your question depends on the circumstances.

using last night as an example,
252 PMPS
92 +7
72 +8.5
66 +9
60 +9.5
59 +10 (steered)
61 +10.25
70 +10.5

Jenks was pretty well surfing without much movement between +8.5 to +10 - so 1.5 hrs of essentially flat, although a slight decline in that time. If it weren't the middle of the night, i'd have let the cycle play out and seen if he got below 50. I don't think there was anything wrong with what you did, and needing to sleep is as good a reason as any for giving high carbs! But . . . one good habit to get into is when Jenks gets into green numbers, you want to get him surfing as long as possible. Some cats respond very well to getting 2 teaspoons (literally) of low carb food. That's just enough to help them coast along without dropping more. He may have risen with just some regular lc food instead of the hc last night. the advantage of that is that it the least you have to give to keep them safe, the more likely you're not going to see a reaction to having been overcarbed.

Saying all that, though, i'm not meaning to criticize. i think you did fine. I'm just responding to your question about whether or not you should've intervened.

In a different scenario, say Jenks was 272 at pmps and at +1 he was at 172, i'd have suggested intervening to slow down his drop. A cat that drops too fast (more than about 50/hr) may bounce simply from the speed of the drop. Intervening in that case is helpful, even though you're not dealing with low numbers.

btw, the test times in your ss cells aren't visible where you have a lot of testing. you can reduce the font to fit it all in. you might find it helpful to put more extensive notes in your comments section so the next time you run into this situation you can look back and see what you did that worked.
 
No drama tonight -- just working on clearing the bounce. That means I might actually catch up on some sleep! :lol:

Julie - thanks, as always for your wisdom! These increasingly regular trips into the green are still new for me, so it will take awhile until I'm accustomed to working with them. I just wasn't sure at what point one begins to sound the alarm when numbers keep going down. Now I know that HC steering is most appropriate for significant drops within a short time span or for readings dipping below 50. Time permitting, next time I see him slowly going down, I'll try my best to allow his cycle to take its natural course. Otherwise, I'll try the LC intervention first.

I just need to sit down and wrangle my spreadsheet for a bit. It's in need of some TLC. I keep all of my readings and notes on a calendar, so it's just a matter of sitting down and filling in all the extras.

Hope you're doing well! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top