Photorecon
Very Active Member
Good morning all,
I followed advised and rolled back to 2.25, probably a good and conservative decision.
There is so many variables that are intervening that adjustment must be on a per hope
basis. This science has lot's of exception but better stick with the rules.
I start to be used to heavy numbers but I guess they will one day get down.
One thing I was wondering is the amazing number I got yesterday night at +4 193 !!
This is close to what we might like more often. Any meaning of this results ?
Wish you all a very good day, think I'll go back to sleep, still tired from me
yesterday's misadventure.
Yesterday numbers at 2.5 : amps : 477 +3 328 +6 272 pmps : 518 +2 320 +4 193
Sébastien
I followed advised and rolled back to 2.25, probably a good and conservative decision.
There is so many variables that are intervening that adjustment must be on a per hope
basis. This science has lot's of exception but better stick with the rules.
I start to be used to heavy numbers but I guess they will one day get down.
One thing I was wondering is the amazing number I got yesterday night at +4 193 !!
This is close to what we might like more often. Any meaning of this results ?
Wish you all a very good day, think I'll go back to sleep, still tired from me
yesterday's misadventure.
Yesterday numbers at 2.5 : amps : 477 +3 328 +6 272 pmps : 518 +2 320 +4 193
Sébastien