LuvinThisPig
Very Active Member
Yesterdays thread
Seeing better numbers today. He started to climb a bit after the +5 due to a food spike. Hoping that the L can pull it back down a bit.
It is my impression, thus far, that the L simply does not have the strength to pull his numbers down more that 20-50 points at any given time. It is simply not in its nature. However, what I am seeing is that it is doing its job of holding those long, flat curves everyone talks of. It seems to me that the R can knock his numbers down about 100pnts and then the L can hold them down at that range, even after meals. The L is taking hold, it just isn't pulling and that is what I need the R for. However, the cumulative nature of L is apparent to me as his numbers stayed down almost entirely flat through out the cycle, but do not quote me on that as I don't have enough data to back that up. I assumed from the last test at +5 last night and todays amps.
Does this seem anywhere close to correct? I could be very wrong with this....
Seeing better numbers today. He started to climb a bit after the +5 due to a food spike. Hoping that the L can pull it back down a bit.
It is my impression, thus far, that the L simply does not have the strength to pull his numbers down more that 20-50 points at any given time. It is simply not in its nature. However, what I am seeing is that it is doing its job of holding those long, flat curves everyone talks of. It seems to me that the R can knock his numbers down about 100pnts and then the L can hold them down at that range, even after meals. The L is taking hold, it just isn't pulling and that is what I need the R for. However, the cumulative nature of L is apparent to me as his numbers stayed down almost entirely flat through out the cycle, but do not quote me on that as I don't have enough data to back that up. I assumed from the last test at +5 last night and todays amps.
Does this seem anywhere close to correct? I could be very wrong with this....