Just a general remark on the food carbohydrate contents. I often read this sentence here : "typically pate style without gravy, chunks, slices, etc are lower in carb". Well, don't count on that. For example, for normal 400g Whiskas cans over here (Belgium), using the "analytical components" on the label, "Terrine Kip" = Pate Chicken has 14,59% ch, and "Gelei Konijn en gevogelte" = chunks rabbit & poultry in jelly has 4,12%. Big difference ! Maybe it's because paté is more "old fashioned" food, so cheaper, that they put less meat in it ?
I shop for cat food using the calculator on my iPhone nowadays, it's the only way, because I can find no general rule, even within one brand and type, a different flavour can have double or half the carbo hydrates.
I calculate like this :
100 - (water + protein + fat + ash + fiber) = carbo hydrates wet (ie. the part they are not obliged to mention)
100 - water = dry matter
carbo hydrates / dry matter = real % carbo hydrates
It's probably only a "worst case" estimate, but it gives an idea.
I shop for cat food using the calculator on my iPhone nowadays, it's the only way, because I can find no general rule, even within one brand and type, a different flavour can have double or half the carbo hydrates.
I calculate like this :
100 - (water + protein + fat + ash + fiber) = carbo hydrates wet (ie. the part they are not obliged to mention)
100 - water = dry matter
carbo hydrates / dry matter = real % carbo hydrates
It's probably only a "worst case" estimate, but it gives an idea.