JacksDads
Member
Following a conversation with our vet, Jack has switched to all raw tonight, and we've gone back down to 4u.
Of course, because the raw is not as delicious as the kibble (in Jack's opinion, I've never tried either) he was not as focused when I gave him his shot (usually he is so absorbed in eating that he doesn't even notice the shot). Just as I was hitting the plunger, he bolted, and I have no idea if he got a full dose, no dose, or something in between.
Because of the change in diet and uncertainty in his dose, I checked his BG at +1, and again @ +2. This is when I got the weird reading. Jack was fidgeting, and my first test I got an error message (e-5: retest with a new strip) I tested again, and because of Jack's fidgeting had a very hard time getting a sample. I'm not sure if the sample was maybe too small, but the reading was 495. I tried one more time, because that # just didn't seem to make sense, and got a good sample with a reading of 179. We checked again at +2:40 and got 165.
Have other people gotten freak numbers like this? Any ideas for what to make of it? For now I've kept the more "reasonable" number in the spreadsheet, with a note in the remarks.
Of course, because the raw is not as delicious as the kibble (in Jack's opinion, I've never tried either) he was not as focused when I gave him his shot (usually he is so absorbed in eating that he doesn't even notice the shot). Just as I was hitting the plunger, he bolted, and I have no idea if he got a full dose, no dose, or something in between.
Because of the change in diet and uncertainty in his dose, I checked his BG at +1, and again @ +2. This is when I got the weird reading. Jack was fidgeting, and my first test I got an error message (e-5: retest with a new strip) I tested again, and because of Jack's fidgeting had a very hard time getting a sample. I'm not sure if the sample was maybe too small, but the reading was 495. I tried one more time, because that # just didn't seem to make sense, and got a good sample with a reading of 179. We checked again at +2:40 and got 165.
Have other people gotten freak numbers like this? Any ideas for what to make of it? For now I've kept the more "reasonable" number in the spreadsheet, with a note in the remarks.