Sue and Oliver (GA) said:
I think we were wondering particularly about the inverse cycles and whether they were an indicator of too much insulin and thought it would be worth a trial.
[quoteI just thought it was worth exploring the inverse curve.
Rob & Harley [/quote]
And you guys could very well be right and that a lower dosage is needed.
We would all have the answer (raise or lower) if we had continuous BG readings where we could see an obvious low that may have triggered rebound.
I want to stress that I think you guys do a fabulous job on this board. If I did not feel that way, i would not send people here. And....I am loathe to post comments to encourage more aggressive recommendations by folks just trying to help out in their spare time on an internet board so please don't take my comments as trying to necessarily push for a more aggressive approach. The fact that the mantra of "better weeks too high than a minute too low" is followed here has kept thousands of cats safe throughout the years.
But that said, I hate watching cats drown in glucose and be subjected to weeks...months of toxicity.
With Copper's case, as stated, there is no clear-cut reason to lower the dosage. Sure, we have some high PS's but no obviously low numbers to tell us that there is any
warranted rebound. And, yes, I have stared at 11/23 until blue in the face but I can't let one day make me continue to worry about rebound.
Also note Lori's notes about how much better Copper has felt when on a higher dose of 2 units. That is a critical part of the picture - how the patient is feeling.
Again, I do not see rebound as a failure. I prefer to push the dosage up and then IF I see clear signs of
warranted rebound, then I can adjust.
I would be increasing Copper's dosage to 2.5 units and holding for ~6 cycles (shots). That is another thing about me...I don't believe that it takes insulin so long to "settle" and will often go up after only 3 or 4 doses (yes...even with Lantus....) if I am seeing no response. If seeing some response, I am more apt to wait a bit longer before going up.
We are ALL at a disadvantage because we don't have continuous BG values. I am no smarter than you guys. You are just as smart as me and if we ALL had a BG reading of every minute of every day, we would all know what to do with those numbers.
The bummer is that we don't know where the patient is at every minute of every day and so we just have to go with the data that we have.
As I was discussing with Lori on the phone, the people who are home testing obviously can push their cats out of glucose toxicity more safely than those who are not testing.
And...of course....if the human is going to be around to watch the cat, it is safer to go up on the dosage. That is why you all are careful to check to see if the human is going to be around or not.
I could type for a long time but have to run.
Again, you guys do a GREAT job here and the diabetic cats of the world are incredibly lucky to have you GENEROUSLY donating your free time to their health. You have saved a lot of lives and increased the quality of life of many deserving furry critters. No doubt about that at all.