the 3 year vaccine is basically the same as a 1 year...My vet offers the 3 year vaccine,think im going to another vet to get her the 1 year Merial purevax vaccine,Should I not shoot her with insulin that day before I go or should I keep my reg schedule? Not sure if one another interacts?? thank you
This is a hot topic in the forum--Each vet will have a different standard for a vaccine waiver/exemption. Many holistic vets consider FD a reason to not vaccinate a indoor diabetic cat. It is a personal decision but there are some safer than others....Its less chance for a sarcoma from what I understand with the 1 year?
I imagine that would be fine UNLESS your cat loses her appetite after the vaccination. In which case reducing the shot accordingly might be the way to go. But that may well not be an issue for you at all. I would definitely go with the 1 year Purevax over a regular vaccine - you 100% want a non-adjuvanted vaccine for her.ASked if it would affect her regular insulin shots and said no,do what you normally do,
Sounds fine to me. I'd test her right before you leave for the appointment just to make sure she isn't dropping low, but as long as her numbers are good at that point I can't imagine the shot interfering much that far through the cycle.I made the appt! I give her the insulin shot at 930am,usually kicks in 6-8 hrs,I made the appt for 3pm,would this interfere at all? They said I should wait 4-6 hrs after insulin shot?
No vaccine should be given between the shoulder blades any more - they should all be given as low down in the leg as possible. Please make sure that your vet does this - it is the newer guideline for vaccinations.My vet usually gives the shot between the shoulder blades,do you think the new vet will do the same? I heard in the leg is better?
a double or triple negative in this sentence, but are you saying they had difficulty establishing efficacy?The three-year Purevax initially failed its qualification testing because not enough cats injected with the rabies virus that were unvaccinated did not contract rabies.
It sounds to me as though the control group failed - the vaccine might have worked perfectly, but if not enough unvaccinated cats contracted rabies after being deliberately infected with it, I guess that would negate the study too.a double or triple negative in this sentence, but are you saying they had difficulty establishing efficacy?
got it!!It sounds to me as though the control group failed - the vaccine might have worked perfectly, but if not enough unvaccinated cats contracted rabies after being deliberately infected with it, I guess that would negate the study too.
No vaccine should be given between the shoulder blades any more - they should all be given as low down in the leg as possible. Please make sure that your vet does this - it is the newer guideline for vaccinations.
Sadly, that is quite likely. Vaccination site sarcoma is a known side effect of vaccinations in cats - hence the newer guidelines to give the vaccine as low down in the leg as is possible...it's still not ideal of course, but that way if the cat does develop sarcoma, they can remove it completely by amputating the affected leg.Maybe thats why she has a sarcoma in the first place???
Just for clarification, all rabies vaccines are either killed or in the case of PureVax, recombinant(which could happen with a standard live vaccine),
This is true now, but MLV used to be the standard form of rabies vaccine until there was an incident where it returned to virulence. MLV is still commonly used for some other vaccines.Just for clarification, all rabies vaccines are either killed or in the case of PureVax, recombinant