Could someone kindly look at Joe's bg spreadsheet (link in signature) and give us some guidance on how to figure out the correct dose for Joe?
For several weeks, from August 20 through September 11, we routinely gave 1.0 unit bid, and it wasn't enough. Most readings were in the 300s or 400s, with a few 200s and 500s thrown in. A fructosamine on September 12 was 554, so we were told to increase his dose to 1.5 bid.
Since then, the readings have been better, but he's bounced around like a rubber ball. In response, we've given him 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 based on where his bg was when it was time to shoot. It's dang confusing!
We think we've learned that 1.5 is okay if he's in the mid 200s or higher. If he's mid 100s to mid 200s, give him 1.0. If he's below the mid 100s, give him 0.5, but don't skip it completely (notice what happened on September 22).
For several weeks, from August 20 through September 11, we routinely gave 1.0 unit bid, and it wasn't enough. Most readings were in the 300s or 400s, with a few 200s and 500s thrown in. A fructosamine on September 12 was 554, so we were told to increase his dose to 1.5 bid.
Since then, the readings have been better, but he's bounced around like a rubber ball. In response, we've given him 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 based on where his bg was when it was time to shoot. It's dang confusing!
We think we've learned that 1.5 is okay if he's in the mid 200s or higher. If he's mid 100s to mid 200s, give him 1.0. If he's below the mid 100s, give him 0.5, but don't skip it completely (notice what happened on September 22).
- Have we learned the correct lesson, i.e., does this seem about right?
- Shouldn't he eventually get to where he gets the same dose, all the time, without this "sliding scale"?