No it does not. I understand that you believe that, but it isn't true. What it does indicate is that the cat's pancreas is doing part of the work.
There isn't enough data to support that claim. In a newly diagnosed cat, the nadir changes, sometimes rapidly. And looking at the trends over time, Scout is entering a new phase of his journey which means that a previous cycle's data may or may not apply at this present time.
Again, prozinc, when it's working well, often results in flattening across the middle of the cycle. Odds were that the lime greens would never have happened and Scout would surf through the middle. In addition, the higher lime green numbers are absolutely not a deadly situation. I understand you experience tremendous anxiety about this, but 50 is the take action number, not the deadly situation number, and scaring people doesn't help the cat or the human.
And yes, I will continue to call out advice like this because it does harm the cats involved, and raises the anxiety of the humans.
I'm sorry but none of what you're saying is logical. "trends over time" ?!?!?
This cat was just diagnosed... there is no "over time" ....
The only consistent thing about this cat is that she DOES nadir later... that she DOES go lower and lower at PS and that she does rise later.
That is the "over time" we're working with.
There is no "new phase", jfc, she's brand new!
This is ALL a new phase.
Everything you say is as if you didn't look at the ss at all...
The limited data shows late nadir, I and others noticed it, the cats owner knows it's a late nadir cat, you're the only one who seems to think that a cat who has consistently had a late nadir is suddenly early nadir while you disregard SO MUCH other data.
It makes no sense.
SURE ... she MIGHT be changing to an early nadir cat...who knows?
But when a cat drops 100 points in just two hours you don't sit around and play guessing games... if its your cat, you do what you need to do to feel safe, period.
And there is nothing wrong with that.
I don't want to argue with you, but since you chimed in with a false accusation against me...and dangerous advice contrary to the pet owners own experience with their cat, I felt compelled to respond.
Please, take ALL the data available into consideration.
There is NO reason for ANYONE to be told they should not have given their cat honey.
ZERO.
ESPECIALLY...
Not someone who was up all night with a newly diagnosed cat who dropped 100 points in just the first two hours!
If you want to start a thread discussing whether or not a newly diagnosed pet parent who sees their cat drop 100 points in two hours to a number below 100 should be told NOT to try to stabilize their own cat then lets do that. But she doesn't need this on this thread.
She chose to give HER cat what SHE felt was right for HER cat in the moment, and here is NOTHING wrong with that!
Are you ever going to explain WHY you think a pet parent should deliberately put their cat into hypo before intervening?
Because I haven't seen you supply a reason for that yet...