That's what it says.Are you sure it is 408? Going from 158 to 408 in one hour seems odd even with the halibut snack.
OkDid you test yet again? Please do. Will wait to hear the result.
Probably 2 T of FFI agree. Shoot the 1.25U. (How much had he eaten before you got that 408 #? I mean excluding the sneaky halibut ...)
Yes. 288That's very odd. Did you get another test by chance?
I did. The little stinker.Go ahead and shoot him.
Yes, thank you! I am going to!Okay we cross posted.Yep, I'd shoot. And maybe then grab a test at +2 or 3 and see where he is headed.
Yep, he's a sneaky little bugger, isn't he? (Lock up your leftovers - there's a chow-hound on the loose!)I did. The little stinker.
Can be. I've seen Bat-Bat spike on just one piece of potato chip. (Which caused me to scold my husband: "If you're gonna miss your mouth while you walk around the house snacking, go outside to do it!") Was that piece of halibut by any chance breaded?Yes, thank you! I am going to!
Awhile back when I was consistently getting high #'s I know it was my feeding him wrong, before testing, or close anyway.
I think he shoots waaay up there on just a little bit of FF even!
Is this common??
Wow, Bat-Bat's like Gypsy was on carb-sensitivity - found I didn't even need "high-carb" food to pull her out of hypo. Sure makes the food selections more limited ...My Gypsy couldn't tolerate above 5% carbs, while other kitties usually do well under 10. Maybe Tucker is really food sensitive. I do think the 408 wasn't accurate like Robin said. I think the before bed test will help clarify.![]()
You're welcome ... and you're doing great, Brenda! Will look forward to seeing that +2 tonight.Thanks for being here!!!
So awesome.
No breading. Naked. Baked pieceCan be. I've seen Bat-Bat spike on just one piece of potato chip. (Which caused me to scold my husband: "If you're gonna miss your mouth while you walk around the house snacking, go outside to do it!") Was that piece of halibut by any chance breaded?
I can do that. Probably be up anyway.Yeah that 408 seemed really strange. Good job on re-testing. If a number like that shows up, always good to re-test.
Ok - So that 288 is still food induced so if you gave 1.25u, then I would definitely test at +2. You have not shot 1.25u for a number in the 200's yet so be sure to set your alarm. We are hoping that you will see a 288 or possibly higher for your 2+ number. If it is a little lower, it still may be ok as long as it is just a little lower. He may go lower tonight but we will see. Good thing it is the weekend, right?
But not halibut. Cat beat you to it!I need to eat myself!.
Let me get back to you on THAT. 9 HOURS LATER.But not halibut. Cat beat you to it!![]()
Me too. I planned on it, but forgot.BTW, how about replacing that 408 on the spreadsheet. It makes me nervous.
Brenda, I usually put a wonky # like that (esp. when I'm doing re-tests) over in comments at right, with the time of the test beside it.BTW, how about replacing that 408 on the spreadsheet. It makes me nervous.
Done, Lady!Brenda, I usually put a wonky # like that (esp. when I'm doing re-tests) over in comments at right, with the time of the test beside it.
Started doing that after I kept having to do multiple BG re-checks to get a shootable #; then I'd just put the shootable # in the chart. (Did that make sense? Just woke up & only have 1/2 cuppa Joe in me.)
Cool ... POETRY!!!Yes, thanks to the Good Thief.. Mom had salad and a filling cup of miso.
"..Yea, you little booger..THAT would not fill YOU up."
Lying on his back with his belly all poofed up, filled with halibut and Fancy Feast..