I have seen it mentioned before but never really seen it in action. The tricky thing IMO is that generally speaking you want longer duration on the shot that is ending in a high PS, which means you should shoot a higher dose on the low PS, and a lower dose on the high PS. Somewhat counter-intuitive. And very problematic given that I wouldn't recommend in most cases to increase the dose on a lower PS. If you lower the dose on the low PS then you are contributing potentially to a higher PS in consequence. And vice versa, shooting a higher dose for the higher PS could leave you unshootable at the PS that is typically low. Hopefully that made sense.
One possibility might be to alter the timing. If you get a high AMPS and low PMPS, why not try shooting an hour early in the AM and head off the higher #, and then your PM shot leave at the regular time so it is like +13. I am just thinking of this right now, so off the top of my head. Slap me if it's a bad idea.

It might be a little tricky b/c the doses might need adjusting accordingly, but roughly I'm thinking that way you could shoot a bigger dose in the AM and hopefully it lasts to +13, and then with testing determine if you need a lower dose in the PM (and since the AM shot will be at +11 there's less of a duration issue), or if the regular dose works just fine since it's a late shot. Just musing really.
My other thought really is more testing to figure out what is going on. Maybe all night is a nice ride in blues and then a jump to reds at +11, or maybe all night long it's a red ride. Without really knowing what's happening (some may already, I don't have any spreadsheets in front of me), I think it makes it tricky to make calls on the doses.
As for the question someone asked about holding doses, first I'll mention there is a lot of controversy & disagreement = can 'o worms question. Some don't believe in holding the dose at all, vs. some like 5 days (I think those cover the extremes on the board, though some vets will want to hold longer than that). What I have seen is that in some cats PZI does have some overlap (we don't call it a shed b/c them'z fightin' words :lol: ). It's not a shed like the Ls, but it does seem in some cats that somewhere in the range of 2 or 3 shots, you can keep the PSs undercontrol and get sort-of a steady state going. Some cats don't get that ever, a few get it maybe in 4 or 5 shots. Some may take longer, though personally I have not seen that (or rather have not interpreted any #s that way).
So that's why on a dose increase in particular it's generally recommended to hold for a least a day or two just in case your cat will get a little overlap going, so you don't risk dangerous lows by accident if overlap does build up. BUT, if you are not on a dose increase path then the holding IMO is less important. Sometimes you can see the effect on a dose decrease - the first cycle will be good but then you lose some momentum on cycle 2 or 3 of that dose and have to bump back up a hair. To me, once you have gotten past the basic dose increase path, you can vary doses every shot if you want - often depends on the cat whether or not that is needed. With Bix, once regulated, if his PS creeped above 180 I would usually fatten up the dose, and if it creeped below 150 I would skinny up the dose. He was more consistent though than most cats in his PSs, and not usually wonky.
Another factor is the wonky one, and I have seen several comment on this with ProZinc (which I have not used). The idea that the cat needs to get used to the dose a little and some wonky #s at first on a dose will settle down after a few days. Personally I'm not convinced it's anything more than liver training, or wonkiness to be ignored as just wonkiness. But then I haven't used ProZinc and it's possible it's enough different from PZI Vet to have a different effect. And also I am a little more on the aggressive side than some, so I don't tend to like holding a dose for very long if you don't have compelling reasons to do so (although I am very supportive of beans holding a dose if that is what they feel is right, or if there are pragmatic factors like they can only test on the weekends or such and don't want to raise doses when not around).
Whew

sorry for the semi-hijack... the soapbox beckoned :lol: