pamela and tigger said:
Before adding in this last comment, after seeing it mentioned in an excerpt from her book online, I researched it and found that it is mentioned numerous times on different websites.
But where is their proof? What reputable evidence are they basing their statements on?
I wish that I had more time to address this but I am swamped right now so the comments will be short.
This appears to be a case of a snowball running downhill perpetuating a falsehood. I did not go to the sites linked below...just no time...but how many of them are simply parroting KS?
Of course, as we all know with the Internet this doesn't mean it is necessarily true.
Very true and this seems to be a good example of that issue. Again, wbcs do not come from the pancreas and they are not full of digestive enzymes that impact the digestion of
food. If she really thinks that the pancreas kicks out a bunch of wbcs that then go into the gut tract and then burst open with enough enzymes...and the right kind of enzymes to actually impact the digestion of food...then she needs to go back and take a course in basic immunology because that is just not the way it works.
Regarding the transit times though. I am sure it would depend on the cat's health, of course, any medications they are on or stress even. So I am sure there is not an absolute cut and dry answer. But as a basic comparison between raw/cooked/dry food, I am just wondering if I should just forget about this whole transit thing. I have been kind of obsessed about it for a while now. :roll:
There are no reputable studies
that I know of that prove that there is a difference in transit time of cooked vs raw meat but I admit that I have not looked hard to find them.....but I really don't think that they are there.
That said....my bottom line is that I am stupid. Plain and simple....I am stupid. Therefore, I will try to stick to nature as closely as possible which is why I wrote this on my website:
From my Making Cat Food page under the heading "Raw vs Cooked":
One of the most common questions I get asked is "why can't I just use this recipe and cook it instead of feeding it raw?" The goal here is to feed a diet that nature intended for your carnivore - staying as close as possible to the form and nutritional composition that your cat would eat in a natural setting - while implementing safety strategies as discussed below.
I am not as smart as nature. I don't know exactly what nutrients and in what amounts and in what form are destroyed/damaged with the cooking process.
However, if sourcing meat from a supermarket versus directly from the producer, I encourage people to 'split the difference' and partially cook (par boil) the outside of whole meats prior to grinding them as noted in my safety section below. This will kill the surface bacteria and will make this diet much safer than dry food. The chicken (thighs) cat food that I make usually ends up being ~25-50% cooked and ~50-75% raw.
End excerpt.
What I do not like to see is the raw foodies perpetuating falsehoods based on no good evidence whatsoever. It just makes all of us look like a bunch of whack jobs emotionally tied to feeding raw food. I feed raw because...again....I am stupid and prefer to defer to nature as much as possible but I won't start making statements (like KS does) about digestibility, transit time...etc...etc...etc without good proof. It just destroys one's credibility.
Let's look at the pancreas of a lot of living beings (humans, cats, and dogs) that eat cooked food. Do we really see a bunch of hyperplastic pancreii?? (Not sure if "pancreii" is the plural of pancreas but it sounds good. :smile: )