owlgal01 said:
I stayed on the 2.6 for several cycles and didn't get anywhere. That is why went up to 2.8.
lori
The first cycle on 2.6 was perfect. The PM cycle that night didn't show a drop, but it gave you the same AMPS as the day before, so he wasn't doing any worse. But then you bumped it up to 2.8 that morning, and had a very flat cycle in pink numbers. That night, you dropped back down to 2.6 again, got a decent drop to +4, and a great AMPS. Shot 2.6 again, got a better PMPS than you had the night before, but bumped up his dose to 2.8 that night.
I know you are paying attention to the nadirs, and you've got a lot of nadir time tests done. I'm also looking at the PS numbers from day to day.
All three numbers (AMPS, nadir, and PMPS) are important. For Copper to get better, all 3 of them need to go down. But if your AMPS and PMPS numbers are getting lower, even if the nadir isn't a lot lower, that's an improvement too.
You can go with 2.5 or 2.6, it doesn't really matter. My thinking was keeping with .25 increments because that is what you have been doing all along. A small increase or decrease of .1 isn't going to do much for him. I wouldn't be surprised if you don't see any difference (beyond meter variance) between two doses .1 apart from each other.
I think the 2.8 might have been too much too soon, and just didn't feel that you had "proof" that the 2.5 wasn't working based on only 2 cycles of trying it.
Whichever dose you pick, stay with it for at least 4 cycles, in my opinion. Unless you see something that warrants an immediate adjustment. If the cycles aren't a real improvement, then go up. If you see repeated long duration like today, or scary low greens (like 50 or so), then maybe reduce. If you see cycles you like, where the preshots keep coming down, then stick with the dose.
I just don't think that one day on a dose is going to be conclusive.
Carl