Oh my...don't they look at the records!
She didn't need to look at the records. I was sitting in the room with her, giving her highly detailed information about Saoirse's clinical signs while on a normal dose of bupe for her weight and the difference when she was on the smaller dose that agreed with her better. Our own vets also sent her the link to Saoirse's spreadsheets. She refused to give weight to all the information I gave her.
Why in the world would a Vet do something like that! That's inexcusable!!!
Lots of experience with Caninsulin, very little experience with Lantus, somewhat hostile towards home testing, and sod all appreciation of the scientifically proven FACT that cats can be tightly regulated safely. Her view was that it is completely unsafe to give a cat any insulin if their off-insulin blood glucose levels are below 11.00mmol/L (c. 200 - ALPHATRAK/LAB values) - and preferably a cat should be in numbers OVER the renal threshold before insulin should be prescribed. She had access to Saoirse's spreadsheet which proved beyond all doubt that it was most certainly possible and safe to give her Lantus at preshots of far less than 11mmol/L. In addition, the diabetes 'specialists' at this particular centre had pronounced Saoirse as a "true diabetic with no hope of ever achieving remission" the year before. Four months before Saoirse went into remission. After being
very tightly regulated on Lantus for three of those months.
A little while after these events transpired I had a relatively frank discussion about things with our own main vet (who knows full well that I know what I'm at with managing Saoirse's insulin treatment, and who
listens). He has a specific interest in feline diabetes, is interested in discussing research (some of the time), and overall is very collaborative and progressive in his treatment style. Within that discussion I eventually told him that, quite frankly, I considered the specialist's approach to diabetes treatment - particularly for cats with comorbid pancreatitis and renal issues - to be completely
backward. I also told him how very upset and angry I was that, despite all of the evidence she was presented with and the additional information I provided during the consults, the specialist basically ignored all of it and went with what she wanted to do, not what was right for my cat (ref. the bupe dosing). My own vet said that most guardians don't have anything like the amount of in-depth knowledge of their cats plus detailed records of their clinical signs as I have and that she probably would not have been used to a client providing such reliable information. I appreciated his acknowledgement of how seriously I take Saoirse's care, but it was cold comfort since all that evidence did us frell all good when faced with such an arrogant gatekeeper. Our own vet could not overrule the specialist, and Saoirse suffered for it.
What infuriates me even more about the specialist insisting that Saoirse should not receive insulin was that she also diagnosed Saoirse with early stage II renal insufficiency. Kidney disease is a recognised sequela of diabetes and quite frankly I think it's appalling that she insisted Saoirse be over the renal threshold before insulin could be prescribed again. I do recognise that many guardians of diabetic pets may not be in the position where they can tightly regulate their cats safely and settle for monitoring of urine glucose levels and water intake to reduce the impact of diabetes on their cats' bodies but I AM in the position to do so. Frankly I think it's appalling to apply a 'one size fits all' approach to treating a disease that comes with so many potentially life-limiting complications if it's not well-managed when the animal's guardian is clearly in a position to
safely do so much more to optimise the patient's health and therefore greatly enhance the prospects of the patient's longevity and quality of life. The specialist's decision actually increased the potential for diabetes to
harm Saoirse's kidneys. Disgraceful. And utterly illogical.
Mogs
.