Cassie 7/9-10 advice please

[bookw0rm]

Amps 235, 0.6u (+11)

 

[bookw0rm]

Re: Cassie 7/9-10

+4 124

 

[Angela&Henry]

Re: Cassie 7/9-10

Looks good, back to Cassie's usual good numbers!

 

[bookw0rm]

Last 2 am cycles have been lovely; last 2 pm cycles are inverse. Anybody have a clue?

 

[bookw0rm]

Pmps 313, 0.8u (+13)

 

[Carl & Polly & Bob (GA)]

Hmmm, I'm calling them "flat" rather than inverse because they are within meter variance. I can't see where the curves in the AM look nice on the same dose as the PM which looks flat/inverse. Makes no sense to me. Especially when you see PMPS numbers lower than AMPS numbers with a nice nadir and it's the longer cycle of the two. Nothing is different as far as when the feeding is AM and PM in relation to the shots?

Carl

 

[bookw0rm]

Nope. 1/4 can of friskees at shot.time and +6. I can see the last one was flat; the first on seemed aful steep. The last couple doses I've reduced too, (except today's pmps) since ps was under 250.

 

[bookw0rm]

+6 200

 

[bookw0rm]

Amps 231, 0.6u (+11)

 

[bookw0rm]

+4 163

 

[Sue and Oliver (GA)]

Looking better, Lisa. Guess he thought you were getting complacent and just wanted to throw you a curve. :mrgreen:

 

[bookw0rm]

Pmps 274, 0.8u (+13)

 

[bookw0rm]

+6 182

Debating trying an official decrease to 0.6 to see what happens.

 

[Carl & Polly & Bob (GA)]

You can try it, Lisa. I like the drop on .8 for this cycle though.

Carl