Re: 9/21 Klinger AMPS 421
Hi Lori,
Klingers ss is not complete and not exactly correct, so you may have the wrong idea.
Also the way she worded her post yesterday may have given you the idea that she shot 3.6u into a 145 PMPS. she did not.
In the AM Monday, she fed him and forgot to test before the food, she waited some period of time, then tested, and got a 494.
She shot a reduced 3.6u because he dropped so fast & so far the day before on 3.8u. I seem to remember it was a 240pt drop, but the day before that, 3.4u gave him only a 75pt drop)
In the pm Monday:
+11.5 he was 145, then she fed- he ate normally
+12 and 10min, he was 187
+13 he was 279, and she shot a very reduced 2.2u because she wanted to be able to shoot at 5:30 AM before work (now only 11 hrs away)
This morning he was back to his normal at 421 at 5:30am (which was +11 and his AMPS)
She reduced again to 3.4u in hopes that his pmps will be a shootable number at 5:30pm
Previously he did not respond very significantly to 3.4u after several days. I had her change the shot location a few days ago, and she has seen a dramatic improvement in the insulin response. That may be the reason that 3.4u is now working better.
Hope that splains it better- I think she may be close to a good dose at 3.4 but we'll see tonight.
Marcy,
Entering data in the he ss is tricky when you have out of the ordinary/off schedule situations like last night. The PS number is the number at the time you actually shoot, which in last nights case was 279, not 145. You can and should put all of that data into your ss, and then hand color the box if you want to.
This is hard to explain , but maybe you could take a look at what I do, (picture is worth a lot of words) and maybe it might make it more clear for others. So they don't freak when they possibly think you shot 3.6 into a 145 (which you would never do- right? lol)
If I'm missing something or that's not what you were talking about I'm sorry, and Lori, if you want to direct her, I'm sure she would appreciate your imput.
