9/19 Jack AMPS 148, +20 minutes 164, +2 94, +5 74, +6 119

Hello,

I’m checking again on Jack’s numbers. This is a continuation of this thread: https://felinediabetes.com/FDMB/threads/9-18-jack-amps-201-2-86.268545/#post-3000857

Here is Jack’s spreadsheet (also below): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v_aftjqVYSgM-Qn0nfFRshmKkSC-KGJBV_JsfgvKKWo/edit?usp=sharing

He was just below 150 BG this morning for AMPS. I stalled for 20 minutes, his BG went up to 164. So I fed and gave him 1U instead of his usual dose. Should I have given a lower dose? He has eaten quite a bit this morning. As of 1pm his BG is 119. Since he dropped to 74 at +5, am I correct that he earned himself another decrease? His dose was 2.25. That would make his dose 2U?

Thank you for any advice you can provide.

 

@Nicole and Jack
I'm going to tag Elise , Bron , Bhooma and Wendy for you whether or not you can take back to back deductions when following SLGS
She's using the Alpha Trak
Nicole can you please not say at 1 PM that his BG was 119 you need to say it was 119 @+6 because we are all in different time zones
In the AMPS you should have put 164 20 minutes under the 148 and color code it blue manually because 164 is the actual BG you shot insulin
I think you should be getting a few more tests in after PMPS , you have no tests afte PMPS for quite a few of them

Can you please look at her SS she gave 1 unit this morning
@tiffmaxee

@Bron and Sheba (GA)

@Bandit's Mom

@Wendy&Neko

Thanks ladies

 

With SLGS you do take back to back reductions. You were right to shoot 2.0 tonight. You will hold this dose for 7 days unless there’s another bg under 90 which would mean another reduction.

 

@tiffmaxee
Hi Elise I'm confused I was looking at another members thread about back to back reductions when following SLGS post #6 and #7 can you please explain it to me why she was told with SLGS you don't take back to back reductions. Was it a different situation for that member


https://felinediabetes.com/FDMB/thr...-455-2-428-9-63-pmps-237.268562/#post-3001008

@tiffmaxee

 

Thank you Diane. That was a typo. With TR we don’t take back to back reductions. With SLGS we do.