AZJenks
Member Since 2014
8/19
How's that for a confusing batch of numbers for ya?
Jenks surfed the upper 60s for a good portion of last night. He was down to 69 at +7, which means he was under a 100 for at least a couple hours previous to that. Then he held on to greens through at least the first quarter of the AM cycle. I think it's reasonable to assume that he was green for at least 10-12 hours, which is amazing.
Unfortunately, we're paying for it at PMPS with larger-than-desirable numbers. We're skirting pink territory here. I really think his body just doesn't know what to do when it's green beyond AMPS.
The good news is that Jenks has amazing resolving power, so if things go as expected (anti-jinx), then this ugly PMPS number should be gone by midcycle.
But to focus on the positive, these long stretches of greens are awesome.
How's that for a confusing batch of numbers for ya?
Jenks surfed the upper 60s for a good portion of last night. He was down to 69 at +7, which means he was under a 100 for at least a couple hours previous to that. Then he held on to greens through at least the first quarter of the AM cycle. I think it's reasonable to assume that he was green for at least 10-12 hours, which is amazing.
Unfortunately, we're paying for it at PMPS with larger-than-desirable numbers. We're skirting pink territory here. I really think his body just doesn't know what to do when it's green beyond AMPS.
The good news is that Jenks has amazing resolving power, so if things go as expected (anti-jinx), then this ugly PMPS number should be gone by midcycle.
But to focus on the positive, these long stretches of greens are awesome.