nckitties3
Member Since 2013
Dose reduced by .25 to 1.75U.
We'll see what happens now.
We'll see what happens now.
Yes, you needed to drop the dose because the 2.25 was too much, dropped to 40's. The fat 2.0 was too much, dropped to 40's again.I couldn't very well keep him on that dose, since he dropped to low/mid 40's twice, right?
I hope one of your other kitties acts as a clean up crew for Lucien's rejects :smile: Luckily, one of my cats will eat any rejects that Wink does not like. Like last night, I tried the chunky chicken and Wink ate around the chunks and eat the plain chicken I had mixed in.He'll rarely eat the same thing twice in a row, so I usually have 2-4 cans open at any given time.
well, with as much as you test... yes, you could have kept him on the 2 fat unit dose or even the 2u dose.nckitties3 said:I couldn't very well keep him on that dose, since he dropped to low/mid 40's twice, right? ohmygod_smile
you're welcome.nckitties3 said:Thanks for the info Jill, I appreciate it very much.
Lucian's 2.0F and 2.25S is the same thing, Somewhere between 2.0 and 2.25, I just changed the wording because I could see no difference and didn't know what to call it. There was no light between the plunger and line, as there should be for a 2.25, know what I'm saying? So that wasn't actually a reduction. That actually started with me not being able to get an accurate dose for a couple cycles and just held it there for a couple more, since it wasn't having a negative effect.
technically, he did earn the reduction so i would never say you "should have" stayed with 2.0 units. given lucian's history/response and knowing there was some residual action from the depot left over which influenced the dose... personally, i would have stuck with 2u bid.nckitties3 said:What I'm seeing, is that I should have stayed at 2.0 and not gone to 1.75? If that's the case, I need to take him back up because he doesn't recover well. His preshots are getting higher each time on 1.75, but I thought it was necessary to keep it a minimum of 6 cycles. What do you suggest with that?
you didn't miss anything in the info. it's not a subject that's explained because it's born from trial & error, lots of experience, and does not apply to each and every cat.nckitties3 said:I understand the idea of keeping him from earning another reduction, right after an earned reduction and will keep that in mind for next time. Thank you for that, it's not explained in the info very well, or I just didn't catch it.