Tina & Rocky
Member Since 2013
Good morning,
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=117605&p=1233940#p1233940
I'm not sure if anyone looked at yesterday's condo but I was thinking that possibly that AMPS +11 reading was an inaccuracy so what we are seeing now is not really a bounce but instead a trend toward higher numbers and not a bounce.
Well, let's see if this same dose of 1.75u does any good to lower his BG in this AMPS cycle today.
Rocky's recap of yesterday:
AMPS 318 +1 348 +3 185 +4 145 +7 182 +11 235
PMPS 180 +2 148 +4 127 +8 215
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=117605&p=1233940#p1233940
I'm not sure if anyone looked at yesterday's condo but I was thinking that possibly that AMPS +11 reading was an inaccuracy so what we are seeing now is not really a bounce but instead a trend toward higher numbers and not a bounce.
Well, let's see if this same dose of 1.75u does any good to lower his BG in this AMPS cycle today.
Rocky's recap of yesterday:
AMPS 318 +1 348 +3 185 +4 145 +7 182 +11 235
PMPS 180 +2 148 +4 127 +8 215