So, this reminds me of the infamous (don't beat me!) Hodgkins argument that a healthy liver will prop the cat up from low numbers. Now, I'm NOT advocating that one shouldn't prop up a low cat with carbs, but I have been wondering for a long time about the impact of adding "fast sugar" into the mix like this (cf. some "old" --now-- discussions on Quintus's condo).
Her method was/is responsible for killing cats, period. There are current members here that were witnesses to that. Because forums that use her method are not transparent and open to the public like this one, it's really hard to assess what her version of TR looks like in action, that's a problem. If there's really nothing to hide, why is it all hidden? Without free access to those forums and unedited/uncensored data, everything she purports is academic at best, as we already know of cases where her theory failed more than one cat.
However well intentioned she may be, she was misguided in the notion that cats cannot clinically hypo (and die) if they have access to low carb wet food. Even if it were true of most cats, you can't categorically claim it won't happen if it can; that is where her credibility went out the window for me. I know your take is to not throw the baby out with the bath water and I see your point there, but at the same time, if one piece of information is so horribly flawed, it does make you wonder how accurate the rest of it is. I might feel differently if she had a mea culpa and revised her method and wording, but as far as I know that hasn't happened.
The very reason she is wrong has, in fact, been extensively studied and published in medical journals, particularly in humans. Two words: hypoglycemia unawareness. Frequent dips in unsafe numbers can make people more sensitive to and less aware of future hypo events, not just consciously unaware of them, but systemically unaware such that counter regulatory mechanisms fail, especially true the longer one has been diabetic. I believe something similar has been observed in cats on this board.
It makes sense when you think about what we do here. Cats come here with their bodies fully convinced that 524 is the perfect and normal level their blood glucose should be and we have to, essentially, desensitize them to lower and lower numbers and retrain them to what is normal. It fits with all the bouncing from lower numbers that aren't really that low, but much lower than what is perceived at the time by their body to be normal. Bounces typically lessen the more time they spend in lower numbers. Some cats go into lime green and just don't bounce perceptively, to this point:
Just to say I'm with you here, wondering if maybe the karo is indeed sending her in a vicious circle, and maybe she's actually more "ok" than we think in these scary numbers.
Indeed, some of the lime green numbers could be perfectly okay and their body treats them as such. The problem being with exogenous insulin in the picture, it's risky to find out how low is that number. The number 50 was designed as a cutoff, not because below 50 is hypo for a cat, but because there needed to be a safety buffer built in that accounts for meter variance, ECID and is marginally higher than what really would be a hypo number.
I agree with you, for sure the Karo or any carbs that raise their BG contribute to this cycle of bouncing, but I just don't see a viable alternative. I certainly wouldn't trust for a second that my cat could eat her way out of a hypo, she can't even eat her way out of a below 50 the majority of the time without the assistance of Karo and it isn't because she won't eat but rather her body response is slower than the rate at which the insulin is pulling her down.
Perhaps there is some magic number that would elicit a counter regulatory response without the high carb intervention,
but, if the insulin is continuing to pull them down when that happens, and the response doesn't happen faster than the rate the insulin is dropping them, it won't matter and it won't work and now the cat is having a seizure or worse.
This happens even in humans (being self aware and very experienced with managing diabetes). I have a family friend that was type 1 and died from a hypo, despite whatever she was trying to do to get her numbers up. I have a family member that is type 1 and has gone unconscious from a hypo on a few occasions and was only saved from a terrible fate by being found by police on the side of the road in his car or being around his wife when it happened so they could give or get him help.
A thought, as this is a case where we're focused on "a number": I can't remember if you have an alphatrak lying around? It might be interesting to test her with the AT when she's "low" to put those numbers into perspective.
I do still have my AT, just don't have any strips left for it.

Asia having several blood draws since diagnosis, I have taken readings with my human meter at the same time her blood was drawn to know it's pretty close to the lab number. AT would only tell me the low number is higher and would be confusing because IMO AT is no more accurate and has the same flaws as any other meter. Besides which, since I don't use AT all the time, one number from it would be rather meaningless. If I had insurance paying for all of Asia's testing supplies, absolutely I would research what is the most accurate compared to lab meter out there and use that one. Something tells me it wouldn't be an AT either.
Also, I hear you very concerned about her kidneys, and wondering exactly how bad the number of yellow hours she's getting really are. I'd personally try and test for glucose to confirm your "sticky pee" assessment, and try and get data on exactly how damaging that much time above renal threshold is, and put that in the balance with the karo and short duration.
Sticky pee is as good as confirmed for me. I have an automatic litter box that rotates 360 degrees to empty the waste, when I say sticky pee, it literally sticks to the base, even when upside down, and I have to manually pry it off unless the pee clump is large enough that gravity does it for me. This never happens in days of blues and green. I would still love to zero in on the threshold with diastix and I'm trying, but not wishing for the several flat yellow cycles it would take to do so.
How bad and how much damage is done are things we may never know with precision for humans or for cats. What is known is that hyperglycemia does major organ damage over time, hypos kill fast, hyperglycemia kills slowly. If that's all I have to go on, I'd rather her spend zero time in yellow or worse. Her time is running out because of her age and many of her organs are in various states of harm already, so I don't want to put kerosene on the fire by allowing her to spend hours each day in harmful numbers.
The Karo issue is more my hang up in this instance. Her chance of remission is slim at this point, with all she has going on. If she were a lot younger, the Karo and beta cell damage would be of much greater concern to me. I bring up the point because it's a point that should be made and discussed, but pertaining specifically to Asia, of the two, the higher numbers will do her greater damage at this point than the Karo.
Other than that, I completely agree that "why" the cat is diabetic isn't taken into account enough. You and I have talked about this, and I think Quintus was a really good example. Reading
these definitions, I'd put Quintus in type 3, and seriously question the general assumption that most cats have type 2 (insulin resistance?) rather than type 1 (we talk about the pancreas starting to work again... so type 1, no?)
I would put Asia in type 3 as well, if I had to guess, but I would categorize her as a type 1 from a treatment perspective as I'm assuming she doesn't make insulin. I do think most cats have type 2 as well, I just don't think something closer to type 1 is necesssily as rare in cats as we are led to believe (meaning less that all the cats have an autoimmune disorder, and more that the cats do not and will not make their own insulin any longer). Type 3 would fit the bill, but even in that category you have stuff you can right the ship from (like steroid induced), and stuff you're not going to bounce back from, which is why the make insulin/can't make insulin categories make more sense. Pancreas working again definitely type 2. Type 1 is autoimmune and the beta cells are attacked and destroyed by the immune system. Type 2 you are taxing the system, but very much still making insulin; if it goes on for too long, however, you can destroy the beta cells because they can't keep up with the constant demand and end up very much like a type 1, although it technically isn't. Acro cats would be another type 3, but you would treat them as type 2.
Thanks for furthering the discussion, good stuff.

I'm bookmarking my own thread.
