11/22 Henry AMPS 344, AMPS + 5.5 311, AMPS + 9 364 PMPS 363, +5.5 388

[Golf2015]

Previous Thread

 

[JaxBenji]

Hope Henry slides down for you today Have a great day, Robert!

 

[Golf2015]

Hope Henry slides down for you today Have a great day, Robert!

Thank You Susanne

 

[Golf2015]

Marje I think the last (5) cycles was more in line with 4.6 to 4.65 units I checked the distance with my calipers

Today PMPS + 0 will be a distance of 4.75 units checked against the calipers

 

[Marje and Gracie]

Let me see if I understand you correctly.

I get the part about the bounce clearing but Henry might spike before the bounce officially clears out ==> would this event possibly occur before AMPS?

By the way I've been studying his spreadsheet and slowing developing trends but more data points would be better predictors. I feel like I'm back in College. My Major at IU Kelley School of Business was DECISION SCIENCES tons of Calculus

Some cats bounce and then just start to clear it and the BG comes down gradually over the course of a cycle. This can happen during the night and present you with a lower AMPS, yes. Some cats also will telegraph their bounce clearing by the BG starting to come down (sometimes even into blue numbers) and then going back up (sometimes into red numbers) before starting the gradual descent of bounce clearing. That high number is called the “high before the break”. My Gracie would do this. Here’s the fun part: a cat might do it sometimes but not others.

Yes...more data points are better predictors. I try not to push too hard when numbers are high so you can save some strips and pokes on Henry’s ears. But, as we get closer to a good dose, that will need to change and more data points will definitely help. Having said that, it’s always helpful to have AMPS, PMPS, and two other data points within each cycle when numbers are high.

Marje I think the last (5) cycles was more in line with 4.6 to 4.65 units I checked the distance with my calipers

Today PMPS + 0 will be a distance of 4.75 units checked against the calipers

So you believe instead of shooting 4.5u, you were shooting 4.6-4.65u? But now you are shooting 4.75u?

BTW, you don’t need to put +0 after AMPS and PMPS because we know that AMPS and PMPS are generally at +12. When they aren’t, in the example where you might shoot early or late, we have a way to show that on the SS. It’s also just fine to list the numbers in the SS like:
11/22 Henry AMPS 344 +5.5 311 +9 364

That way it saves you space and, believe me, at some point, you’ll need it. We also generally start over at PMPS so you can take the AMPS data out of the subject line and begin with PMPS.

 

[Golf2015]

Some cats bounce and then just start to clear it and the BG comes down gradually over the course of a cycle. This can happen during the night and present you with a lower AMPS, yes. Some cats also will telegraph their bounce clearing by the BG starting to come down (sometimes even into blue numbers) and then going back up (sometimes into red numbers) before starting the gradual descent of bounce clearing. That high number is called the “high before the break”. My Gracie would do this. Here’s the fun part: a cat might do it sometimes but not others.

Yes...more data points are better predictors. I try not to push too hard when numbers are high so you can save some strips and pokes on Henry’s ears. But, as we get closer to a good dose, that will need to change and more data points will definitely help. Having said that, it’s always helpful to have AMPS, PMPS, and two other data points within each cycle when numbers are high.


So you believe instead of shooting 4.5u, you were shooting 4.6-4.65u? But now you are shooting 4.75u?

BTW, you don’t need to put +0 after AMPS and PMPS because we know that AMPS and PMPS are generally at +12. When they aren’t, in the example where you might shoot early or late, we have a way to show that on the SS. It’s also just fine to list the numbers in the SS like:
11/22 Henry AMPS 344 +5.5 311 +9 364

That way it saves you space and, believe me, at some point, you’ll need it. We also generally start over at PMPS so you can take the AMPS data out of the subject line and begin with PMPS.

So you believe instead of shooting 4.5u, you were shooting 4.6-4.65u? But now you are shooting 4.75u?

The 4.6 to 4.65 units would be more accurate for the first (5) cycles of the 4.75 populated cells on the spreadsheet - does this make sense?

I updated the spreadsheet to reflect my point

 

[Golf2015]

Marje I have (2) Human Meters (Quantity of Two ==>Nova Max Plus) at what point would a good transition point ?

Once Henry is regulated?

 

[Marje and Gracie]

So you believe instead of shooting 4.5u, you were shooting 4.6-4.65u? But now you are shooting 4.75u?

The 4.6 to 4.65 units would be more accurate for the first (5) cycles of the 4.75 populated cells on the spreadsheet - does this make sense?

I updated the spreadsheet to reflect my point

Got it! It hasn’t been six cycles since his blue numbers so let’s see what he does tomorrow.

Marje I have (2) Human Meters (Quantity of Two ==>Nova Max Plus) at what point would a good transition point ?

Once Henry is regulated?

I’m sorry....I don’t understand your question. Do you mean you want to switch to an entirely different meter? Or you want to switch from one you have to the other? Sorry to be dense.