10/3 Angie pmps=306 +3=263 +4=255/182 - variance btw meters?

Status
Not open for further replies.

GraceAndAngie

Member Since 2013
Good morning LL,

Mum and I almost cheered when we saw Angie's amps. I'm getting used to yellows it seems. I've stopped hoping for green and started hoping for yellow pre shot and am looking forward to seeing blue mid-cycle. If it continues like this she'll get a dosecrease tomorrow night - after 6 cycles on this dose.

4 out of 5 p's - but playing is so rare for Angie these days. She's a little old lady and is getting a bit rickety. I've started brushing her after testing, if she's still cross. She loves her brush so much. She gets so happy that she bites it and licks it. It's one of those spiky scratchy ones so I can't imagine that's comfortable. She slept with her chin on it last night. I leave it facing up so that she can brush her own chin with it. :lol: She's been refusing treats from me after testing - because she's cross. We worked out that if I hold them behind my back and don't look at her, she'll eat the treat! :? Any left-over crossness disappears once the brush comes out though.

Big hugs and healing vines to beans and kitties that need them.
 
Re: 10/3 Angie amps=250

Nice sunny start for Angie. I hope she gives you some nice numbers today. Silly kitty on the treats. I'm glad you figured out the brushing thing after testing.
 
Re: 10/3 Angie pmps=306 +3=263 +4=255/182 - variance btw met

Angie's +4 was 255 on the meter we've been using. I got an extra big drop of blood this evening and she was sitting so nicely on my knee so I quickly did a test with my other meter. From the same drop of blood, just seconds later, it came out as 182. Is that within the realms of normal variance between meters/tests? Or, might I have a problem with one of my meters?

Thank you, again!
 
Re: 10/3 Angie pmps=306 +3=263 +4=255/182 - variance btw met

I think it is within meter variance as it can be off up or down by 20%. So if the 255 might be 205 and the 186 might be 218. I wish the meters were more accurate!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top