? 12/16 Eddie AMPS 272 +3 139 +5 76 +7 140 PMPS 311 +3 299

Ok, so I had two ways to go, one was to hold the dose and another was to increase .25 because of renal threshold concerns.

i couldn't wait any longer and opted, to be safe, to hold the dose. I will check today and track him. My thought was to increase but I came down on the side of the known. I hope by holding something will give...
 
I suspect that a lot depends on how you view the 104 nadir yesterday. and how easy or difficult it is to steer Eddie's numbers if he drops below your dose reduction point. Just seeing his numbers from last night and this morning, the only concern I would have had was whether the bounce from the 355 was breaking at AMPS. If that was the case, increasing could make for an "exciting" day. Seeing how the cycle plays out was likely a good decision and you can always increase at PMPS or tomorrow if the numbers warrant.
 
Sienne and Gabby (GA) said:
I suspect that a lot depends on how you view the 104 nadir yesterday. and how easy or difficult it is to steer Eddie's numbers if he drops below your dose reduction point. Just seeing his numbers from last night and this morning, the only concern I would have had was whether the bounce from the 355 was breaking at AMPS. If that was the case, increasing could make for an "exciting" day. Seeing how the cycle plays out was likely a good decision and you can always increase at PMPS or tomorrow if the numbers warrant.
Click to expand...
Just posted below but at @ +3 139, I gave a little LC snack and will test again @ +5. Thank you!!
 
Sounds good on the food, though I would have done LC myself as that's what worked for Neko. As you get closer to nadir or after, you need less carbs.
 
Ah look we jinxed it! Holding the dose worked out

Although that's technically below reduction point I'm not sure I'd reduce, but see how rest of cycle goes first
 
Ok, well @+7 140. Nadir might have been +6, perhaps? The question is about dose. His earned reduction has always been 78 and today he hit 76. Every time, though, he's got a reduction with that number he bounces and rebounds and skydives.

What do you think @Wendy&Neko ? Should I hold the dose @ 8u just to try something different rather than a reduction?

@FrostD and @Sienne and Gabby (GA) ?
 
Since you'll be around, I'm inclined to hold it. Even with that time you'll be away tomorrow afternoon, that's not that long. I don't really see any other signs of SRT effects at the moment, not to say it won't happen.

I'd hold pred dose right where it's at for now, just to see if that truly is helping.
 
What do you think @Wendy&Neko ? Should I hold the dose @ 8u just to try something different rather than the reduction/bounce cycle?
FrostD said:
Since you'll be around, I'm inclined to hold it. Even with that time you'll be away tomorrow afternoon, that's not that long. I don't really see any other signs of SRT effects at the moment, not to say it won't happen.

I'd hold pred dose right where it's at for now, just to see if that truly is helping.
Click to expand...

Yep, holding Pred @ around +8.

I will hold 8u again tonight and keep a close eye on him.

For tonight, hoping that @Bandit's Mom is on board.

Thank you!!!
 
You could try holding and see how he dose. That was such a quick touchdown in the greens. Maybe next time if you see green mid cycle ish, stick to just LC and see what he does. Often they'll surf the greens if you give them a tsp or two of LC. I'd like him to be more comfy in greens, to reduce the bouncing, or at least how high he goes.
 
Wendy&Neko said:
You could try holding and see how he dose. That was such a quick touchdown in the greens. Maybe next time if you see green mid cycle ish, stick to just LC and see what he does. Often they'll surf the greens if you give them a tsp or two of LC. I'd like him to be more comfy in greens, to reduce the bouncing, or at least how high he goes.
Click to expand...
I do feel that holding the dose is appropriate right now, for some reason. I will also hold to giving a tsp or two of LC and, hopefully, keep the bouncing under control.
Thanks, Wendy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top