10/14 LT AMPS 125 +2 105 +4 113 +6 119 +8 128 +10.5 110 PMPS 104 +2 124 Stay the course?

Suzanne Burton

Member Since 2019
Suzanne,
Remember when I told you the AT meter users were looking for 130 and under, instead of 100 and under? You might have learned differently, but I felt I should let you know @Marje and Gracie, told me that was wrong. The only thing we do differently, is reduce when under 68, not 50. A few weeks ago, I printed information from The University of Queensland in Australia, last updated April, 2009. I thought it was part of the protocol used here. There were 5 phases (stage 3 holding the dose), and they did, in fact, have separate guidelines for the human and feline calibrated meter.
 
Suzanne,
Remember when I told you the AT meter users were looking for 130 and under, instead of 100 and under? You might have learned differently, but I felt I should let you know @Marje and Gracie, told me that was wrong. The only thing we do differently, is reduce when under 68, not 50. A few weeks ago, I printed information from The University of Queensland in Australia, last updated April, 2009. I thought it was part of the protocol used here. There were 5 phases (stage 3 holding the dose), and they did, in fact, have separate guidelines for the human and feline calibrated meter.
Do you have a link for the article? I'm interested in perusing it.
 
Suzanne,
Remember when I told you the AT meter users were looking for 130 and under, instead of 100 and under? You might have learned differently, but I felt I should let you know @Marje and Gracie, told me that was wrong. The only thing we do differently, is reduce when under 68, not 50. A few weeks ago, I printed information from The University of Queensland in Australia, last updated April, 2009. I thought it was part of the protocol used here. There were 5 phases (stage 3 holding the dose), and they did, in fact, have separate guidelines for the human and feline calibrated meter.
Do you have a link for the article? I'm interested in perusing it.

Remember that what we are using here for TR is based on the 2013 Roomp/Rand document and from Tilly’s Diabetes Homepage. From those, we have developed a “slightly modified TR protocol” that we use here. Reference the Sticky on the TR Protocol and SLGS Method of regulation.
 
Remember that what we are using here for TR is based on the 2013 Roomp/Rand document and from Tilly’s Diabetes Homepage. From those, we have developed a “slightly modified TR protocol” that we use here. Reference the Sticky on the TR Protocol and SLGS Method of regulation.
That is exactly what I was looking for, but failed to find in the past. Now, things are falling into place much better. Sometimes I'm a little slow. Thank you very much Marje.
 
Remember that what we are using here for TR is based on the 2013 Roomp/Rand document and from Tilly’s Diabetes Homepage. From those, we have developed a “slightly modified TR protocol” that we use here. Reference the Sticky on the TR Protocol and SLGS Method of regulation.
Well, LT hasn't read any articles, so he just keeps on doing what he's doing; sitting on the beach and throwing pebbles into the lagoon.
 
Well, LT hasn't read any articles, so he just keeps on doing what he's doing; sitting on the beach and throwing pebbles into the lagoon.
lol!
Suzanne - I'm starting over again, and I'm shocked at some links I missed. Back to school for me!!!!
I knew this material was referenced; I think I'm blaming my previously bad eyes. I had been trying to search online for what was already here.
 
I don't have any experience with the Pettest meter. Or how it compares to the AT. Have you ever tested numbers with a different meter? Without that, we just have to assume it reads similar to the AT.
 
Back
Top