If there are a couple of cycles you could monitor (get a few mid-cycle tests), you could try a little increase to start bringing in some greens.
The best person to ask about a sliding scale is @JanetNJ.I have given Sam .5 unit with an AMPS of 147 and .75 unit at 152 before and she stayed in safe numbers. If I start Sam on 1 unit tomorrow and her PMPS would be 147 or lower would you suggest we start a sliding scale and give her .75 unit instead of a full unit or give her the 1 unit and see how she responds?
Try 145 and above 1 unit 130-145 0.75I have given Sam .5 unit with an AMPS of 147 and .75 unit at 152 before and she stayed in safe numbers. If I start Sam on 1 unit tomorrow and her PMPS would be 147 or lower would you suggest we start a sliding scale and give her .75 unit instead of a full unit or give her the 1 unit and see how she responds?
Definitely get some mid cycle tests today - they're essential in knowing what the dose is doing. I know you badly want to see green but this is a process that can't be rushed.I gave her 1 unit and left some extra food for her. I will go home at lunch and check her which would be +6.5 or +7. That seems to be when she drops. It's a bit aggressive but I haven't had her hit a green number for NADIR yet and she only seems to drop 40-50 points. The more I look at her SS I should of maybe gone with .75.
I think she will be ok there. I'm always nervous and second guess when I have to change her dose but she hasn't given me a scare on the Prozinc yet.![]()
Definitely get some mid cycle tests today - they're essential in knowing what the dose is doing. I know you badly want to see green but this is a process that can't be rushed.
I would really recommend that you get a curve as soon as you have a day when you can. You don't actually have enough data to know for sure how she drops right now. The last curve you had was on a 0.25 dose which was too low. She could be hitting lower numbers at a time when you aren't testing.
Also, looking at your note, her first test was 118. A non-diabetic cat is between 50-120, which means they don't need insulin in those ranges.
Based on the data you do have, and since you left food out for her, I think she'll be alright (though please do go home at lunch to check on her!), but if this happens again, I would recommend giving a reduced dose or skipping unless you'll be around to monitor more. Sam's numbers aren't so bad that you need to be overly aggressive in your dosing right now. She's below the renal threshold most of the time, and her numbers are coming down, which usually calls for a more conservative approach.
Hmmm...maybe I'm confused. I don't see +3 and +4 data, but you said you tested at those times a decent amount, and that the drops happened later. I'm also not seeing cycles that show the +3 and +6 in the same cycle to see the drop at this dose. Which cycles should I be looking at?
Most cats don't hit nadir until +5 to +7, so likely her nadir isn't until sometime in that range, but again ECID. Mama-sense and papa-sense are real things, so you are most likely exactly right, but since we are out here on the internet, we have to rely on the data we can see to draw conclusions.
Sam hasn't shown dramatic drops (at least not that we can see), but her numbers are wiggling down, which when you consider the overall pattern is an indication that caution in dosing is appropriate. Cats on their way down can surprise you in a way that cats on their way up don't. And when the insulin grabs hold of an already low number, it will sometimes just cause the kitty to surf in a good range, but sometimes it will cause a dive. Since we can't be there to help ensure a kitty's safety, we error on the side of caution. As I said before, based on the data I can see, I'm guessing she's fine today, even if the full dose isn't what most of us would advise for an un-monitored cycle. We often use the phrase, "you hold the syringe" around here. You are always welcome to make whatever decision you think is best, regardless of anything anyone here suggests.
I'd say so. Can you grab a before bed test tonight?
Good call I think. It's surprising that she didn't have a much different PMPS yesterday after the NS in the morning. She appears to stay very flat and the curve today will be interesting to see.I went with .75 and will try to get a curve today and see where she goes with her BG.
Dosing based on bounce numbers isn't a good idea. Sam doesn't seem to be particularly bouncy, though. You have to judge a dose on both PS and nadir values. I tend to focus a bit more on nadir because too low is riskier than too high. She might have been OK with a 1 u on this AM's PS but it's hard to know for sure. I'm basing that on the flatness of her responses to date.looks like she only went up from her AMPS until now. She will be getting tested in the next 30 minutes. If she is still around 200 I will give 1 unit for sure. If her AMPS tomorrow is 140 or less would you say go with 1 unit or do you think she had a bounce from the 140 and it wasn't necessarily too low of a dose?
Hard to decide because she doesn't have a very distinct nadir. If she was mine and I was able to monitor carefully, I'd be tempted to try 1 u on a PS similar to this AM's.I will give 1 unit tonight and see what she gives for AMPS tomorrow. Do you suggest .75 again tomorrow if she is 145 or less to see if she was bouncing today?
Hard to decide because she doesn't have a very distinct nadir. If she was mine and I was able to monitor carefully, I'd be tempted to try 1 u on a PS similar to this AM's.
Most of those are within the 20% meter variance, so essentially a flat curve. You can increase to 1.25 u soon on a day when you can monitor.
I think it's time to increase her dose. It's her pattern to stay quite flat but the whole curve can come down some.
It's very possible. Maury has flirted near 3.0U a couple times and doesn't stay there longYea I'm thinking she will probably end up around 2 units. I was hoping she would be able to be a lower dose than that.