6/24 Muffin AMPS 311 +2 255

[Julie + Muffin]

Yesterday: http://www.felinediabetes.com/FDMB/threads/6-23-muffin-amps-405.179680/#post-1987864
Morning
Nothing much to report. Staying the course at .5 unless something drastic happens and then I will post for help. Hope you all are doing great today!

 

[Tanya and Ducia]

Hi Julie, and Muffin,

I am sure you know it by now but with the +2 being much lower than the PS I'd watch out and offer a little LC snack right after the +2 test, if you haven't done it already. And test again at +3 to see which way the wind is blowing.

 

[Julie + Muffin]

Hi Julie, and Muffin,

I am sure you know it by now but with the +2 being much lower than the PS I'd watch out and offer a little LC snack right after the +2 test, if you haven't done it already. And test again at +3 to see which way the wind is blowing.

At this point Tanya I need reinforcement like your comment today. It helps a lot. Thanks!!!!

 

[Tanya and Ducia]

Hmm.. Glad to be helpful! Take a look at my Ducia's SS - going thru the very same pattern today.
What's the expression -" two heads better than one?"

 

[Tanya and Ducia]

Hi Julie,
I saw the 328 for the +2 test.
Normally I would put my lancets down after that BUT:
Adrian and Chino reported very low number last night after the +2 test being HIGHER than the PS...Not to alarm you but if the safety 1st then perhaps you can grab the +5?
I am known for being overly cautious though...

 

[Julie + Muffin]

Hi Tanya...

Hi Julie,
I saw the 328 for the +2 test.
Normally I would put my lancets down after that BUT:
Adrian and Chino reported very low number last night after the +2 test being HIGHER than the PS...Not to alarm you but if the safety 1st then perhaps you can grab the +5?
I am known for being overly cautious though...

Hi ....I'm confused on your post. Do you mean you wouldn't test any more for the night?

 

[Tanya and Ducia]

Hi Tanya...


Hi ....I'm confused on your post. Do you mean you wouldn't test any more for the night?

Sorry, I didn't mean to create confusion. What I wanted to say was that I would take another test, after the +2 regardless of it being higher than the PS. I see in your SS that you did take another test at +6.
Usually, if the +2 higher then the PS the cycle is going to be uneventful. And normally I stop testing after getting the +2 higher than the PS.However, yesterday someone here reported catching very low number even though his +2 was higher than the PS, and it was reasonable not to expect any further lowering and to stop testing for the night.
I meant to tell that "usual rules" don't work sometimes. And wanted you to be cautious. Sorry for the confusing post.

 

[Julie + Muffin]

Sorry, I didn't mean to create confusion. What I wanted to say was that I would take another test, after the +2 regardless of it being higher than the PS. I see in your SS that you did take another test at +6.
Usually, if the +2 higher then the PS the cycle is going to be uneventful. And normally I stop testing after getting the +2 higher than the PS.However, yesterday someone here reported catching very low number even though his +2 was higher than the PS, and it was reasonable not to expect any further lowering and to stop testing for the night.
I meant to tell that "usual rules" don't work sometimes. And wanted you to be cautious. Sorry for the confusing post.

Thanks Tanya...that helped a lot.