EVO wet food/dry food

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kathryn Cavanaugh-Dias

Member Since 2016
What is your opinion on the EVO canned/dry food? Is the dry food a lot like the Young Again? And, would the EVO canned food be any better for my cat then lets say a Fancy Feast pate? I know they have about the same carb count, but do you think ingredients wise it would be a better choice? Thanks for your help.
 
Can't really comment on the Evo canned vs Fancy Feast as Murphy can't eat either one - as far as the dry - I feed Murphy both Evo and Young Again - both have the same amount of calories (very high, around 600/cup) I personally prefer Young Again as it does not raise Murphy's blood sugar at all - Evo does raise it to some extent - I think the carb content is a little higher with Evo. Young Again has really tiny, tiny pieces , Evo is more normal size kibble. Many people have great luck with Evo - it's the Every Cat is different scenario. There's another two dry foods with low(er) carbs -Wysong's Epigen 90 and Waggers - a semi-moist no grain, no starch food that does not raise Murphy's blood sugar.
 
What is your opinion on the EVO canned/dry food? Is the dry food a lot like the Young Again? And, would the EVO canned food be any better for my cat then lets say a Fancy Feast pate? I know they have about the same carb count, but do you think ingredients wise it would be a better choice? Thanks for your help.


I was feeding the Evo canned for quite a while, but then Goof got tired of it. I had a couple of cans left, and fed one the other day, he loved it. I personally feel the the ingredients are better, but then it's more expensive so they should be. But I also think that Wellness is comparable in both ingredients and price. Evo used to package it in 13 oz cans which made it a little more affordable but then they started with the 5oz cans only which jacked up the cost a little too much for my taste. I have 5 cats (had 6) so cost is a factor for me. I've been feeding the Friskies pates, but I'm thinking of switching as my cats are always hungry now. Especially Goof, he's lost weight and is always STARVING. We've done some testing, but all looks good, so I'm thinking that the food just is too much water and not enough FOOD.

THE Evo dry was very well liked by the whole crew, pricey, but not as bad as Young Again or Wysong. If I only had one cat, I'd be feeding one of those, but with my crew, it's simply not economically feasible. Evo used to be 8% carbs and all the kitties loved it, but then they changed the formula and it's now like 12-13 carbs, too much.

I'm going to check out the Wagger's semi-moist, hadn't heard of it before Carol's post.
 
Can't really comment on the Evo canned vs Fancy Feast as Murphy can't eat either one - as far as the dry - I feed Murphy both Evo and Young Again - both have the same amount of calories (very high, around 600/cup) I personally prefer Young Again as it does not raise Murphy's blood sugar at all - Evo does raise it to some extent - I think the carb content is a little higher with Evo. Young Again has really tiny, tiny pieces , Evo is more normal size kibble. Many people have great luck with Evo - it's the Every Cat is different scenario. There's another two dry foods with low(er) carbs -Wysong's Epigen 90 and Waggers - a semi-moist no grain, no starch food that does not raise Murphy's blood sugar.


Carol, do you know what the carb counts are of this food?
 
Dr. Lisa did comment on low carb dry foods in several threads on FDMB:
Susan - please see my Urinary Tract Health page - specifically Opie's pictures - for reasons why feeding a water-deleted diet to cats very often sets them up for a great deal of pain and suffering.

I find that people give up far too easily when trying to transition their cat to a more appropriately-hydrated diet. Pay me now or pay me later. Of course, the sad part is that these cats really suffer which is far worse than the hit to your wallet. (Note that Opie's vet bill was $4,350.)

Please see the Tips for Transitioning on my website and remember that diet is far more than just about carb content.

I really appreciate your clarification.

What bothers me deeply about some of the responses on this particular thread is the defensiveness and the comments that make anyone - including myself - fearful of reminding people that feeding water-depleted diets does cause a lot of suffering. I intellectually understand the defensiveness but it is not how I would respond to the comments I made in my first post. My personality is such that if I had read what was written above about "cats suffering" I would not have gotten defensive but would simply have learned from the fact-based statement.

The problem with getting defensive is that it serves to make other board members reluctant to remind people to think past the **dietary carb**issue and to remember that the problems associated with **water depletion** are VERY common and VERY significant.

Unfortunately, this is a fact and there is just ***no sugar-coating it.***

As i have stated on other threads, I will bet that if anyone ever had to deal with a cat with a urethral obstruction, +\- subsequent bladder rupture, and their very painful cries, they would be just as passionate as I am about this subject.

To a comment made above - no, it is **not** necessarily "common knowledge" that canned is better than dry so you are very much mistaken about that issue. In fact, many of my colleagues who refuse to utilize the common sense part of their brain still recommend dry over canned so it is not "common knowledge".

What IS "common" is cats ending up with urethral obstructions and other UT issues.

Because of this sad and dangerous fact, it is very important that when dry food threads are brought up on this board, urethral obstructions, as well as basic urinary tract health, are mentioned. Just saying "canned is better than dry" without mentioning some specifics is not going to make much impact.

One other option to typing out the important urinary health issues is to just recommend that the person asking about dry food visits my Urinary Tract Health page.

To the comment that "millions of cats have lived well on dry food".... the six blocked cats I just dealt with over the past 10-14 days won't find much solace in that.

Again, and I don't think this can ever be repeated too often, I really do sympathize with anyone dealing with a diabetic cat. I know that you are all incredibly stressed. Plus, many of you do much better than I would at dealing with this disease!! I have also acknowledged many times that switching a diabetic dry-food-addict is harder than a non-diabetic.....no doubt about that. And, there is no doubt that cat owners will vary with respect to their commitment to getting their cats switched to a water-rich diet but none of these are reasons why any board member should refrain from repeatedly discussing the very serious urinary tract health problems that arise from the feeding of water-depleted diets.

Also note that I work with a lot of rescuers who feed feral cats and who, obviously, cannot afford to feed much canned food. Therefore, I recommend that they soak the dry food before feeding. Yes, this wii increase the bacterial content but that is a risk that I willingly take rather than risk a urethral obstruction. Of course this method backfires for dry food addicts that are fixated on the **texture** but it helps people who are feeding a lot of cats on a budget.
 
Has Dr. Pierson updated catinfo.org since the advent of dry foods like Young Again, Evo etc? Dry foods with little or no carbs? I know her major concern is dehydration so I am wondering if these foods served with a water soaking might be ok?

If kitty will eat dry food soaked in water then they should eat wet food. Apart from the bacterial issues Julia found the quotes for, in my opinion feeding the most natural least processed food you can is always better. This applies to feeding anything - cats, humans, dogs, snails - anything! Hence why a raw diet is the gold star diet for kitties followed by wet food and then dry coming in as the worst.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top