Jen & Abby
Member Since 2015
Today was Abby's three-week checkup, where her fructosamines were to be tested. I had been a diligent bg tester since Dx, and was pretty proud of the spreadsheet I'd created to keep track of her numbers and any other notes.
I was told to give two units of Lantus twice a day, but as I was testing her, sometimes she would go low, and I didn't want to dose and then have to leave for work. Consequently I've been adjusting the dose as her bg varies.
The vet told me today that my spreadsheet "means nothing", that fructosamines are the indicator of how well a cat is doing. When I asked her what glucose range I should be targeting, she says "250-385 is normal for kitties". I just stared at her without a word.
Then she berates me for testing Abby's bg, because she said it would make the fructosamine test inaccurate because I'm adjusting her dosage. She asked me, "Well, if you hadn't been testing her bg, how do you think she would be doing?"
I replied, "Without testing, my cat would have been dead four days ago when she had a 37 bg, because I would have just blindly shot her up with 2 units because that's what I was told to do."
The vet had nothing to say to that, but she knows I'm disgruntled. I'm also upset. She discounted all the effort I put in for my cat's well-being.
As a diabetic myself, why on earth would I dose myself without testing first to see how much I need? I certainly wouldn't do that to Abby. I'm NOT going back to that vet, that's for sure.
I'm alternating between being very angry and very sad, because if I hadn't been testing her, I could have killed her with too much insulin! (I learned that Abby is asymptomatic during hypoglycemia, making things a bit more complicated!)
I'm curious as to how others have dealt with vets who expect you to be a bit hands-off in treating feline diabetes.
I was told to give two units of Lantus twice a day, but as I was testing her, sometimes she would go low, and I didn't want to dose and then have to leave for work. Consequently I've been adjusting the dose as her bg varies.
The vet told me today that my spreadsheet "means nothing", that fructosamines are the indicator of how well a cat is doing. When I asked her what glucose range I should be targeting, she says "250-385 is normal for kitties". I just stared at her without a word.
Then she berates me for testing Abby's bg, because she said it would make the fructosamine test inaccurate because I'm adjusting her dosage. She asked me, "Well, if you hadn't been testing her bg, how do you think she would be doing?"
I replied, "Without testing, my cat would have been dead four days ago when she had a 37 bg, because I would have just blindly shot her up with 2 units because that's what I was told to do."
The vet had nothing to say to that, but she knows I'm disgruntled. I'm also upset. She discounted all the effort I put in for my cat's well-being.
As a diabetic myself, why on earth would I dose myself without testing first to see how much I need? I certainly wouldn't do that to Abby. I'm NOT going back to that vet, that's for sure.
I'm alternating between being very angry and very sad, because if I hadn't been testing her, I could have killed her with too much insulin! (I learned that Abby is asymptomatic during hypoglycemia, making things a bit more complicated!)
I'm curious as to how others have dealt with vets who expect you to be a bit hands-off in treating feline diabetes.

Sadly.