kphmitten said:
I do think it's important that vets are more aware of exactly what they're being told to push....
Please understand that I am not trying to pick on you but I am using your comments as a springboard for my pet peeves.
The "what they are being told to push" really raises my hackles because it speaks to the 'ring in the nose' issue...ie....new Wonder Drug comes out marketed by Company X. Company X's drug reps take Dr. A to lunch and gives them their sales pitch but Dr. A does not do his/her due diligence by independently looking past the research conducted by Company X and also fails to apply common sense regarding the pros and cons of using this new Wonder Drug.
No doctor should be "told to push" any drug and if they are "told to push" then they need to push back.
I am not just speaking of DVMs. I am also speaking about MDs. I am CONSTANTLY fighting the issue of polypharmacy with my elderly parents' doctors....the latest issue coming up just this evening and...once again...I have to call my dad's doctor about an issue....so this is a HUGE pet peeve of mine.
I suppose by "aware and well versed" I assume that if the vet says "we'll do this" then an owner won't just say, "OK." I think it's the owner's responsibility to ask the hard questions about side effects and adverse reactions before giving the vet the go ahead to administer it.
We are probably just going to keep going around in circles here and will have to respectfully agree to disagree.
I am not going to let the doctor off the hook and lay this at the lay person's feet. I think that is very unfair. Why is it not logical and fair to expect Dr. A to walk into the exam room and say "we can treat with Drug A or B and here is a quick rundown of the pros and cons of each." ?
But instead, Dr. A can walk in the room and say, "your cat has an infection and so I am going to give him a shot of Convenia." Then Dr. A stands back and waits and hopes that the client does not take up more time by asking "so...are there any other options to this drug called Convenia? What are the side effects of Convenia versus my other options?"
Let's face it, most people are pretty darn stressed when they take their beloved pet to the doctor. Heck....*I* am stressed beyond words when I take my own cats to the clinic!! Yes...that is true...I find that my heart rate is up...and I am stressed when subjecting my cats to a carrier and car ride...never mind my worry over why they are in there to begin with. So if *I* (a person who has been in this profession for over 30 years...) am stressed, why should I expect a lay person to start quizzing me (as the vet) on the pros and cons of medications or expect them to say "wait a minute while I pop on the internet and do some research."...???
Also, I am a research nerd. If I go to research something, I can guarantee that it will be at least 1 hour of time and often it may be several hours of reading. How do you expect a lay person to pop on their iPad or Blackberry and do a comprehensive internet search while under a serious time constraint ....and while in a stressful situation?
Plus, let's not forget about the 'White Coat' issue whereby many people are intimidated by the white coat and stethoscope. The vast majority of people are not going to speak up in any way that may be seen as a challenge and....ask a doctor to "wait a minute while I do my own research to see if I agree with you or not". Let's just say that it is a very rare person who will have the strength to do that.
I also don't think it's too crazy for pet owners to be aware of "common" drugs their pet may be prescribed - Rimadyl, Tramadol, Clavamox, etc.
I will agree that it makes my job much easier when clients have taken the time to educate themselves on these common drugs but I consider it a plus...not a ticket for me to omit a side effects-discussion with them. I am not going to penalize someone because they haven't taken the time to read a Rimadyl or Tramadol insert.
While I can understand that they shouldn't have to do this, I don't think it's necessarily wise to give blind trust in their vet.
I very much agree that we can all get into trouble by blindly trusting *any* health care professional - DVM, or MD, or tech, nurse, etc.
I do remember when the clinic I worked at first received Convenia in '09 - practically every little thing that might reqIuire an antibiotic was "Let's use Convenia!" Abcess? Convenia! Amputation? Convenia! Ripped nail? Convenia! It was definitely used way too often
Many clinics are still using it in this irresponsible manner. That is why I wrote the article. This is a prime example of doctors not doing their due diligence and not applying common sense and good medical practice.
as the go-to unless the client wanted something less expensive - I don't know if it's come down in price (haha!) but it was certainly expensive. It was ridiculous.
Now for a comment that I did not put on my main article.....
Most people are not aware that Convenia is a drug that needs to be reconstituted and has a short shelf-life (28 days) once reconstituted.
Now...human nature being what it is....if you have a patient that you feel needs an antibiotic and you have multiple choices with one being Convenia that is soon to be outdated....which one will *some* humans (remember...human nature being what it is....) be biased toward?
I would love to say that no doctor - DVM or MD - would EVER put cost-savings (to themselves) over what is best for the patient but.....
Now if any colleagues are reading this and getting upset....don't....unless the 'shoe fits'. If the shoe does not fit, then don't wear it...ie...if you would never pick a dose of soon-to-be-outdated Convenia over a safer drug like clavamox, etc., just to save you from having to throw out an expensive, out-dated drug....then you have no reason to be upset by what I just typed.