Thanks for the reply, Eliz. :smile:
I'm cool with our main vet seeing the data, but I think it may raise a few disapproving eyebrows with some of the other practice members: I get the feeling that I'm an unusual client in terms of the frequency of testing. I'm finding that the data are invaluable: they are letting Saoirse communicate her needs to me so that i might help her better. For example, my practice consults with an external diabetes expert. Said expert saw some of Saoirse's early data (before the LC sensitive food started working its magic). The specialist's preliminary view was that Saoirse appeared to be a "true diabetic" and would more than likely remain insulin-dependent. Personally, I think Saoirse developed a problem with her pancreas that was compounded by her having an outmoded, species-inappropriate treatment protocol inflicted on her. The steroid jab she received at the May consult didn't help her any either (50% increase in PU/PD).
If I'm interpreting the data correctly, it appears that Saoirse has functioning pancreatic beta-cells. Whether she has enough remains to be determined. (Is that a fair assessment?). If my interpretation is correct and the specialist's initial take is wrong, then that alone justifies the testing because it is providing a basis for choosing treatment options based on fact and not conjecture. Much more importantly, the testing has kept Saoirse safe from the worst ravages of the Caninsulin treatment.
BTW, I'm a bit better today (taking suitable foods, supplements, and token dose of offending Rx medication (thank you for asking! :smile: ) It ain't pleasant, but it's just the latest episode in the soap opera that my life has become since the accident. Hey ho! :roll: