C
Carl & Polly & Bob (GA)
Guest
There's a thread in Lantus TR asking if anyone has ever seen a difference between their readings on the AT meter vs. any other brand of meter. I know Lori, and I think Donna and Denise? (when going through the freestyle nightmare) may have also used an AT? Can any of you post in this thread?
http://felinediabetes.com/FDMB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=66746&p=725708#p725708
There's a new member in Lantus that saw a scary low number (59) on her AT the other day, and at first they thought "OMG, that's a 30 point difference possibly from what a human meter would have read!" meaning it could have been a 29 on a human meter. I think they are trying to determine if the AT and a human meter are that much different, and whether it matters what the range of numbers is. Like is it off by 30 points on high numbers, and maybe off by a lot less on low numbers? Any first hand knowledge would be helpful.
Thanks,
Carl
http://felinediabetes.com/FDMB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=66746&p=725708#p725708
There's a new member in Lantus that saw a scary low number (59) on her AT the other day, and at first they thought "OMG, that's a 30 point difference possibly from what a human meter would have read!" meaning it could have been a 29 on a human meter. I think they are trying to determine if the AT and a human meter are that much different, and whether it matters what the range of numbers is. Like is it off by 30 points on high numbers, and maybe off by a lot less on low numbers? Any first hand knowledge would be helpful.
Thanks,
Carl
