Tom & Monty
Member Since 2020
Another false reading of 47 initially though.
I think the my glucometer has an issue detecting sample sizes. This time I noticed that the absorbent part of the strip wasn't entirely saturated with blood on the reading of 50, tested again with a bigger sample at 104. I'll be careful in future to visually inspect the test strip when I see a surprising number.
I think the my glucometer has an issue detecting sample sizes. This time I noticed that the absorbent part of the strip wasn't entirely saturated with blood on the reading of 50, tested again with a bigger sample at 104. I'll be careful in future to visually inspect the test strip when I see a surprising number.