VDS variable dosing explained in more detail
I echo just about everything Nancy said with the following modifications:
I think the "scale" should not be so set in stone based on a certain PS but more about where the PSes are headed/trending and where you want them to go. SO we enter into what I call "variable dosing." I tend to watch the trends of the PSes then adjust up or down the dose to try to get the next PS more in the territory that I want it. Meanwhile trying to take things slowly and not try to make the next PS exactly where I want it but to move it
towards the area I want it. One can always move the next dose up a little more if the dose just given does not bring the next PS down by the amount desired. And I like to think of everything revolving around the dose [at the time] that I would expect to keep the PS steady. Then one can add a little more or less depending on the need.
I think the last note I wrote you was that .7 was bringing her PSes down slowly except for the odd morning. So here is what I *might* have done with some of your recent numbers and not any appetite differences or changes:
351 .7
312 .7
272 .7
242 .7
348 .8
247 .7
178 .65
259 .7
My thinking is that .7 seems to bring her down almost perfectly slowly [with the exception of some oddities]. .7 seems to bring her down maybe 30 points at a time? Maybe .65 might be the number to hold her steady? Bringing them down slowly is like betting at the roulette table - you bet with what's hot and not against the table: if a certain dose is taking you in the direction you want than stick with it and over time it will take you where you need to go. But when the table changes then you need to change your bet. Not sure if that's the best metaphor or not?
BUT, obviously the world is not perfect and S has a variable appetite and many other things that could raise or lower her numbers at the time. So you will have to take that into consideration which I cannot in my above sample since I'm not there to observe.
But basically if she is not eating much and the numbers are going down on a dose that would have normally held her PSes steady or brought them down, then you would need to start backing off on the dose a little. Then when the appetite kicks back in, and their numbers start to go back up then you have to follow them back up with the dosing but trying not to get too aggressive hopefully. As the appetite waxes or wanes so will that expected dose that you would expect to hold the PS steady from PS to PS. I always felt like I was 12 hours behind but even with that feeling things generally worked out OK.
And obviously you have to take the nadir into consideration so that you do not go too low.
Since I did not test at night I tended not to make any "risky" moves at night - or I might just play it safer at night if I were debating doses. Is any of this making sense? Please let me know if I can help clarify. I know I'm probably not doing the best job explaining things. Also You might want to search out "variable dosing" or "VDS" in the PZI forum and see if you find anything worth reading. I don't think I've really had anyone ask me super detailed questions though before about it.
And I encourage you to take what input of mine that works for you and do your own riff on it and toss out what does not work. Also do not hesitate to PM me if needed - but I am expected to be at the computer infrequently until perhaps the end of Oct.
You can also *try* to study our old ProZinc SS to see how we did it. I generally was happy to keep the PS's under 200 and very happy to keep them under 150-160.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key ... XYwVFJ4M0E
Since I was one of the first ProZinc users here I tried to make the SS as informative as possible to others and included weights and some appetite notes so others might be able to follow my decision making process.