Good to hear you had some time with the IM vet and saw him face to face. I'd love to know the title of the IAA article. There are so few out there, and mostly studies on just tiny cohorts, ie. 5 cats or so. R is definitely a possible tool. It might help flatten him out a bit if given the last half of the cycle. Of course, with IAA the R action can sometimes lead to active cycles after that (ie. night time) and more night time monitoring
I'm kind of hoping the dose increase threat gets Eddie moving.
10.2 kg! What was he before diabetes diagnosis?
Article has
very tiny cohort: N=1 in fact but the point is that he actually went out of his way to print it and give it to me saying "you've probably read everything before 2021". Of course I haven't but this seems such a conciliatory gesture since he wouldn't even talk about IAA previously. The article appears in
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, "Relationship between anti-insulin antibody production and severe insulin resistance in a diabetic cat" 83 (4): 661-666, 2021. (multiple authors but you should be able to find it if you wanted).
One of the issues raised in the article is the switch from insulin glargine to insulin detemir when they encountered hyperglycemia after 6 days of various treatment including infusion of R and subcutaneous injection of glargine.
The IM discussed R but said given that we are dealing with SRT and acro that he does not recommend going that route.
He just emailed me to send the report (which I'll try and attach). In the email he says,
The main findings are:
Complete blood count: within normal limits
Biochemical profile:
BG normal range! Electrolytes in normal range!
Alb slightly elevated, in my opinion representing mild dehydration. Clinical Pathologist comes up with other explanation, but neither of us thinks there is pathology involved.
Creat 210 is very mild elevation, unclear if this is renal or pre-renal. I think the latter given the elevated Alb.
Over-all I'm impressed how beautiful these values look. Your are doing many things right with Eddie. That allows you to take some more time for yourself by decreasing the monitoring frequency of Eddie.
I recommend a recheck in 4-6 months, and that you contact Genevieve to decide if a CT is required or not.
No medication changes proposed
I love his exclamation marks!! I also think it kind of sweet that he was concerned about my well-being in doing late night TR.
Eddie's got a slightly higher than normal Creatinine and yet the IM says this might be related to lymphopenia, which can be stress-related and any going to a vet is just that for Eddie.
What kind of intrigues me is the Glucose, Serum: Eddie 142 and this was after loading him into the carrier (which he hates), driving to the vet, sitting in the car and being carried into the clinic, having his neck shaved and nails clipped.
What do you see in all this, Wendy? I'm with you on the dose increase threat. I was surprised that the IM vet said he thought Eddie's spreadsheet numbers were really good.